Diagnosis and repair of gypsum plaster coatings: statistical characterization and lessons learned from a field survey

    Ana Pereira Info
    Filipe Palha Info
    Jorge de Brito Info
    José Dinis Silvestre Info

Abstract

This paper provides the statistical characterization of the pathological situation of 119 gypsum plaster coatings applied to partition walls and ceilings (inner gypsum plasters – IGP), the diagnosis methods that can be used to characterize the defects and confirm their causes, and the most suitable repair solutions. The results presented in this paper were achieved via the use of an expert system developed by the authors in an extensive inspection programme covering 23 buildings. A comprehensive set of charts and their detailed statistical analysis describe the results achieved, including the characteristics (temporal, spatial and severity) and frequency of the defects in the sample and the main causes of their occurrence in walls and ceilings. The most appropriate diagnosis methods, preventive measures and repair solutions prescribed for these defects in the sample are also analyzed and the most significant correlations presented. Even though in some instances the pathological situation of IGP is common knowledge, this time it has been characterized via quantitative indicators and using a statistically significant sample, which means that important lessons can be learned.

Keywords:

defect, diagnosis, gypsum plaster, inspection system, pathology, repair

How to Cite

Diagnosis and repair of gypsum plaster coatings: statistical characterization and lessons learned from a field survey. (2014). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.801918

Share

Published in Issue
March 10, 2014
Abstract Views
712

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2014-03-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Diagnosis and repair of gypsum plaster coatings: statistical characterization and lessons learned from a field survey. (2014). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.801918

Share