A fuzzy analytic network process method for risk prioritization in freeway PPP projects: an Iranian case study

    Alireza Valipour Info
    Nordin Yahaya Info
    Norhazilan Md Noor Info
    Simona Kildienė Info
    Hadi Sarvari Info
    Abbas Mardani Info

Abstract

Risk assessment is one of the most important factors in achieving success in public-private partnership (PPP) projects. Some relationships between risks in freeway projects have been established. The occurrence of each risk can worsen the effects of others such as a negative impact of financial risks on construction risks. This paper is aimed at prioritizing significant risks in freeway PPP projects applying a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) method for overcoming the problems of interdependencies and feedback among different risk-ranking alternatives. Data on the study have been collected through a literature review, an interview and a questionnaire survey distributed to experts in the field of freeway PPP projects. The obtained results have shown that financial, legal and political risks are the most significant groups, although improper design, changes in the value of granted lands and the termination of concession are the most important risks. The findings help with strengthening the capabilities of developing countries for risk management in freeway PPP projects.

Keywords:

risk prioritzation, PPP projects, fuzzy method, ANP method, freeway projects

How to Cite

A fuzzy analytic network process method for risk prioritization in freeway PPP projects: an Iranian case study. (2015). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(7), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1051104

Share

Published in Issue
July 10, 2015
Abstract Views
1648

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2015-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A fuzzy analytic network process method for risk prioritization in freeway PPP projects: an Iranian case study. (2015). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(7), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1051104

Share