Multidisciplinary approach to the structural, hydraulic, and mechanical design of a steel decay vessel for the SHiP experiment at CERN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2026.26525Abstract
In March 2024, the Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) experiment and its associated Beam Dump Facility (BDF) were selected for future physics exploitation using the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at CERN. SHiP is a general-purpose, intensity-frontier experiment designed to search for dark matter-related physics. Proposed approximately a decade ago, the SHiP experiment has passed through multiple design stages and optimizations. This study focuses on the structural design of primary subcomponent of SHiP, i.e., “the decay volume”, where the experiment seeks decay signatures of new particles. Initial concepts included a reinforced-concrete structure with hollow rectangular cross-sections exceeding 10 m × 5 m, evolving to a 50-m-long conical steel vessel under vacuum, and more recently to a metal-framed helium balloon, which is a textile helium seal supported by steel frames. We present the structural and hydraulic configurations now considered the final reference solutions for decay vessel of the SHiP to highlight the unique engineering challenges of minimizing structural mass, thereby reducing particle interactions and enhancing physics performance. To provide context, the paper first summarizes the collaboration status of SHiP and subsequently reviews the sequence of decay vessel structural options explored since the inception of the project. This historical overview depicts how the decade-long, multidisciplinary effort shaped current design choices. Furthermore, it illustrates how a novel, multidisciplinary, integrated approach guided the design evolution of the decay vessel. In the context of large-scale international collaborations such as SHiP, this paper demonstrates that a coordinated strategy integrating structural, hydraulic, and detector requirements has seldom been applied in similar large experimental facilities. As demonstrated in this study, such an approach proved essential for achieving a configuration that satisfies engineering constraints while preserving the experiment’s physics performance goals. The principal outcome of this effort is the proposed final design strategy, which coalesces engineering and physics goals into a unified framework. This methodology ensured that all subsystem interactions were considered concurrently to prevent costly redesigns during project execution. The final design strategy separates the mechanical system of the decay vessel into two key components: (i) a structural steel framework and (ii) non-structural aluminum elements, both integrated with a complex hydraulic system to circulate a specific detection liquid. This division maintains functional and structural efficiency and offers flexibility to adapt to seismic-condition variations throughout the project.
Keywords:
SHiP experiment, decay vessel, steel structure, aluminum structure, hydraulic design, CERNHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abbaneo, D., Acampora, G., Ahmad, S., Albanese, R., Alexandrov, A., Alicante, F., Aloschi, F., Androsov, K., Anokhina, A., Asawatangtrakuldee, C., Ayala Torres, M. A., Bangaru, N., Battilana, C., Bay, A., Bertocco, A., Betancourt, C., Bick, D., Biswas, R., Blanco Castro, A., … Zamora Saa, J. (2025). Installation and performance of the 3rd veto plane at the SND@LHC detector. Journal of Instrumentation, 20(7), Article P07011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/20/07/P07011
Ahdida, C., Akmete, A., Albanese, R., Alt, J., Alexandrov, A., Anokhina, A., Aoki, S., Arduini, G., Atkin, E., Azorskiy, N., Back, J. J., Bagulya, A., Baaltasar Dos Santos, F., Baranov, A., Bardou, F., Barker, G. J., Battistin, M., Bauche, J., Bay, A., … Zimmerman, J. (2022). The SHiP experiment at the proposed CERN SPS beam dump facility. The European Physical Journal C, 82(5), Article 486. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10346-5
Alshibani, A., Almuhtaseb, O., Mohammed, A., & Ghaithan, A. M. (2024). A regression-based model for parametric cost estimation of industrial steel structures. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 31(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2024.22472
Alt, J., Bezshyyko, O., Böhles, M., Brignoli, A., Conaboy, A., Deucher, P., Eckardt, C., Ernst, A., Fischer, H., & Hollnagel, A. (2024). Performance of a first full-size WOM-based liquid scintillator detector cell as prototype for the SHiP Surrounding Background Tagger. Journal of Instrumentation, 19, Article P05024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05024
European Committee for Standardization. (2002). Eurocode 0: Basis of structural design (EN 1990). Brussels. European Committee for Standardization. (2004a). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance –Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998-1:2004). Brussels. European Committee for Standardization. (2004b). Unfired pressure vessels (EN 13445). Brussels.
European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-3: General rules—Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and sheeting (EN-1993-1-3). Brussels.
Coronado-Hernández, O. E., Fuertes-Miquel, V. S., Besharat, M., & Ramos, H. M. (2018). Subatmospheric pressure in a water draining pipeline with an air pocket. Urban Water Journal, 15(4), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1475578
De Martino, G., Fontana, N., & Giugni, M. (2008). Transient flow caused by air expulsion through an orifice. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(9), 1395–1399. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:9(1395)
Ehlert, M., Hollnagel, A., Korol, I., Korzenev, A., Lacker, H., Mermod, P., Schliwinski, J., Shihora, L., Venkova, P., & Wurm, M. (2019). Proof-of-principle measurements with a liquid-scintillator detector using wavelength-shifting optical modules. Journal of Instrumentation, 14(3), Article P03021.
Elmousalami, H. H. (2020). Artificial intelligence and parametric construction cost estimate modeling: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1), Article 03119008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001678
Fuertes-Miquel, V. S., Coronado-Hernández, O. E., Iglesias-Rey, P. L., & Mora-Meliá, D. (2019). Transient phenomena during the emptying process of a single pipe with water–air interaction. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 57(3), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1492465
Georgantzia, E., Gkantou, M., & Kamaris, G. S. (2021). Aluminium alloys as structural material: A review of research. Engineering Structures, 227, Article 111372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111372
Gülich, J. F. (2010). Operation of centrifugal pumps. In Centrifugal pumps (pp. 665–714). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12824-0_11
Hou, Q., Tijsseling, A. S., Laanearu, J., Annus, I., Koppel, T., Bergant, A., Vučković, S., Anderson, A., & van ’t Westende, J. M. C. (2014). Experimental investigation on rapid filling of a large-scale pipeline. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140(11), Article 04014053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000914
Lopez Sola, E., Calviani, M., Aberle, O., Ahdida, C., Avigni, P., Battistin, M., Bianchi, L., Burger, S., Busom Descarrega, J., Canhoto Espadanal, J., Cano-Pleite, E., Casolino, M., Fraser, M. A., Gilardoni, S., Girod, S., Grenard, J.-L., Grenier, D., Guinchard, M., Hessler, C., … Zuccalli, L. (2019). Beam impact tests of a prototype target for the beam dump facility at CERN: Experimental setup and preliminary analysis of the online results. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, 22(12), Article 123001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.123001
Malekpour, A., Karney, B. W., & Nault, J. (2016). Physical understanding of sudden pressurization of pipe systems with entrapped air: Energy auditing approach. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142(2), Article 04015049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001067
Martins, N. M. C., Delgado, J. N., Ramos, H. M., & Covas, D. I. C. (2017). Maximum transient pressures in a rapidly filling pipeline with entrapped air using a CFD model. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 55(4), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1275046
Miano, A., Fiorillo, A., Salzano, A., Prota, A., & Jacobsson, R. (2020). The structural design of the decay volume for the search for hidden particles (SHIP) project. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 21(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00152-9
Minh, H.-L., Sang-To, T., Le-Van, B., Le-Tien, L., & Cuong-Le, T. (2024). Design optimization of a large industrial steel structure using an enhanced K-means clustering optimizer and finite-element model updating. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 25(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-024-01092-4
Mittelstedt, C. (2023). Theory of plates and shells. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66805-4
Rössing, F., Arutinov, D., Brignoli, A., Fischer, H., Grewing, C., Lacker, H., Lyons, F., Zambanini, A., & van Waasen, S. (2024). Design space exploration for particle detector read-out implementations in Matlab and Simulink on the example of the SHiP SBT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03122
Svendsen, B. T., Petersen, Ø. W., Frøseth, G. T., & Rønnquist, A. (2023). Improved finite element model updating of a full-scale steel bridge using sensitivity analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1944227
Tijsseling, A. S., Hou, Q., Bozkuş, Z., & Laanearu, J. (2016). Improved one-dimensional models for rapid emptying and filling of pipelines. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 138(3), Article 031301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031508
Truong, D.-N., & Chou, J.-S. (2023). Integrating enhanced optimization with finite element analysis for designing steel structure weight under multiple constraints. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 29(8), 757–786. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2023.20399
Venskus, A., Kalanta, S., Atkočiūnas, J., & Ulitinas, T. (2010). Integrated load optimization of elastic–plastic axisymmetric plates at shakedown. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.22
White, F. M. (2016). Fluid mechanics (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Zhou, L., & Liu, D. (2013). Experimental investigation of entrapped air pocket in a partially full water pipe. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51(4), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.785985
Zhou, L., Liu, D., & Ou, C. (2011). Simulation of flow transients in a water filling pipe containing entrapped air pocket with VOF model. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 5(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015357
Zhou, L., Wang, H., Karney, B., Liu, D., Wang, P., & Guo, S. (2018). Dynamic behavior of entrapped air pocket in a water filling pipeline. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 144(8), Article 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001491
Zingoni, A. (2017). Membrane theory of shells of revolution. In Shell structures in civil and mechanical engineering (Chapter 2, pp. 35–56). ICE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1680/ssicame.60289.035
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.