Journal of Civil Engineering and Management: contribution to development and application of MCDM methods in construction management
Abstract
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have improved considerably since the 1970s and are applied in many fields, demonstrating that the field of decision research remains important and valuable. Multi-criteria methods contribute to the research in civil engineering and construction management by identifying the optimal alternatives considering conflicting objectives. Researchers are applying MCDM methods in specific areas of civil engineering to resolve conflicts between economic, environmental and technological criteria. On the occasion of the 80th birthday of Prof. E. K. Zavadskas and 30 years of the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management (JCEM), this article aims to summarize the performance indicators of JCEM and its contribution to the development and application of MCDM methods in construction management. The journal’s performance indicators are outlined using bibliometric analysis.
Keyword : Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, bibliometric review, MCDM methods, construction management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021a). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Pandey, N. (2021b). A bibliometric review of International Marketing Review (IMR): past, present, and future. International Marketing Review, 38(5), 840–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0244
Fan, Y., Ali, Z., & Yin, S. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of EDAS method and power aggregation operators: Theory and applications with recent bipolar complex fuzzy linguistic developments. IEEE Access, 12, 39110–39128. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369917
Farooq, R. (2024). A review of knowledge management research in the past three decades: A bibliometric analysis. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(2), 339–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0169
Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2016). A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 60–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.040
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., Liao, H., & Herrera, F. (2019). An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: Theory, developments, applications, and challenges. Information Fusion, 51, 145–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.12.002
Kumar, S., Chavan, M., & Pandey, N. (2023). Journal of International Management: A 25-year review using bibliometric analysis. Journal of International Management, 29(1), Article 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100988
Laengle, S., Merigó, J. M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., Dysone, R. G., Oliveira, J. F. & Teunter, R. (2017). Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 803–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027
Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad, S., Saman, M. Z. M., & Ibrahim, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.045
Mukherjee, D., Kumar, S., Donthu, N., Pandey, N. (2021). Research published in management international review from 2006 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. Management International Review, 61, 599–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-021-00454-x
Pandey, V., Komal, & Dincer, H. (2023). A review on TOPSIS method and its extensions for different applications with recent development. Soft Computing, 27(23), 18011–18039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09011-0
Passos Neto, G. D. M., Alencar, L. H., & Valdes-Vasquez, R. (2023). Multiple-criteria methods for assessing social sustainability in the built environment: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(23), Article 16231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316231
Stefano, N. M., Casarotto Filho, N., Vergara, L. G. L., & da Rocha, R. U. G. (2015). COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment): State of the art research and its applications. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 13(12), 3899–3906. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2015.7404925
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Yepes-Nuñez, J. J., Urrútia, G., Romero-García, M., & Alonso-Fernández, S. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
Yu, D. J., Xu, Z. S., & Fujita, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis on the evolution of applied intelligence. Applied Intelligence, 49(2), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1278-z
Zurita, G., Shukla, A. K., Pino, J. A., Merigó, J. M., Lobos-Ossandón, V., & Muhuri, P. K. (2020). A bibliometric overview of the journal of network and computer applications between 1997 and 2019. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 165, Article 102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102695