Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808Abstract
There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options.
First published online: 03 Apr 2017
Keywords:
multifunctional inverted flat roof, multi-criteria evaluation, the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative, MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making), SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), game theoryHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.