Youth adoption of artificial intelligence in Central and Eastern Europe: evidence from Romania and Poland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2026.28058Abstract
This study examines young people in Central and Eastern Europe adopting artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on Romania and Poland. It identifies main drivers of behavioral intentions toward AI by integrating micro, meso, and macro-level factors. Data from 502 respondents aged 18–34 were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Measurement invariance was tested with MICOM, and cross-country differences were assessed through Multi-Group Analysis (MGA). The model explains 39.5% of the variance in future AI use. Personal benefits were the strongest predictor, followed by AI integration and social environment, while perceived socio-economic benefits had a smaller but significant effect. Risk perceptions and gender showed no significant impact. MGA confirmed stronger effects of integration in Romania and benefits in Poland. The findings suggest country-tailored strategies: Romania should prioritize accessibility and ease of use, while Poland should emphasize career-related benefits and institutional resources. Universities and policymakers could support AI adoption by expanding AI literacy initiatives and by leveraging peer-based learning environments. The study contributes by applying a multi-level adoption framework to an underexplored region, highlighting how contextual factors shape AI adoption among Generation Z.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence adoption, Generation Z, Central and Eastern Europe, PLS-SEM, MICOM/MGA, Romania and PolandHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdo-Salloum, A. M., & Al-Mousawi, H. Y. (2025). Accounting students’ technology readiness, perceptions, and digital competence toward artificial intelligence adoption in accounting curricula. Journal of Accounting Education, 70, Article 100951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100951
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 35(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
Bădulescu, D., Simuţ, R., Bodog, S.-A., Bădulescu, A., Simuţ, C., & Daniela, Z. (2025). Shaping AI-related competencies for labor market and business. A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2025.1.6894
Bunea, O.-I., Corboș, R.-A., Mișu, S. I., Triculescu, M., & Trifu, A. (2024). The next-generation shopper: A study of Generation-Z perceptions of AI in online shopping. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 2605–2629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19040125
Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Ramos-de-Luna, I., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F. (2020). Online recommendation systems: Factors influencing use in e-commerce. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 8888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218888
Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123247–123247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123247
Celik, I. (2023). Exploring the determinants of Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83, Article 102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026
Chang, Y.-Y., Davidavičienė, V., Bronner, A., & Raj. S., Y. (2025). Overqualified yet motivated: Work motivation, technology uncertainty and overqualified employees’ innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 952–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2025.3546164
Chardonnens, S. (2025). Adapting educational practices for Generation Z: Integrating metacognitive strategies and artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1504726
Davidaviciene, V., & Al Majzoub, K. (2022). The effect of cultural intelligence, conflict, and transformational leadership on decision-making processes in virtual teams. Social Sciences, 11(2), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020064
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), Article 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Duse, C. S., & Duse, D. M. (2017). The teacher of the Generation Z. In E. Soare, & C. Langa (Eds.), European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences: Vol. 23. Education facing contemporary world issues (pp. 690–697). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.05.02.84
Dusseault, B., Sims, M., & Berardino, M. (2025). AI early adopter districts: The promises and challenges of using AI to transform education. Center on Reinventing Public Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED674608
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Enam, M. A., Murmu, C., & Dixon, E. (2025). “Artificial Intelligence—Carrying us into the Future”: A study of older adults’ perceptions of LLM-based chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(21), 13747–13770. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2476710
Enríquez, B. G. A., Ballesteros, M. A. A., Jordan, O. H., Roca, C. L., & Tirado, K. S. (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: Effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Fülöp, M. T., Topor, D. I., Ionescu, C. A., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Măgdaș, N. (2023). Ethical concerns associated with artificial intelligence in the accounting profession: A curse or a blessing? Journal of Business Economics and Management, 24(2), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2023.19251
Gansser, O., & Reich, C. (2021). A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, 65, 101535–101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535
García, K., Ong, A. K. S., Gumasing, M. J. J., & Reyes, C. R. (2025). Engineering students’ perceptions and actual use of AI-based math tools for solving mathematical problems. Acta Psychologica, 256, 105004–105004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105004
Gerlich, M. (2023). Perceptions and acceptance of artificial intelligence: A multi-dimensional study. Social Sciences, 12(9), 502–502. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090502
Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A., & Bunker, J. (2020). Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040106
Göller, D., Gschwendt, C., & Wolter, S. C. (2023). “This time it’s different”—Generative Artificial intelligence and occupational choice. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4651059
Gu, H., Schreyer, M., Moffitt, K., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence co-piloted auditing. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4444763
Guerra-Tamez, C. R., Flores, K. K., Serna-Mendiburu, G. M., Robles, D. C., & Cortés, J. I. (2024). Decoding Gen Z: AI’s influence on brand trust and purchasing behavior. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1323512. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1323512
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What is the future? AI, 1(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020008
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
Horodyski, P. (2023). Recruiter’s perception of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in recruitment. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, Article 100298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100298
Howell, B. (2024). WEIRD? institutions and consumers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in 31 countries. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4902254
Iancu, I., & Iancu, B. (2023). Interacting with chatbots later in life: A technology acceptance perspective in COVID-19 pandemic situation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1111003
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022). In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making. Policy & Internet, 14(2), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.276
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kazi, M. T., & Mandge, M. O. (2024). AI and its dual impacts on society. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(6), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.63202
Kelley, P. G., Yang, Y., Heldreth, C., Moessner, C., Sedley, A., Kramm, A., Newman, D. T., & Woodruff, A. (2021). Exciting, useful, worrying, futuristic: Public perception of artificial intelligence in 8 countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 627–637). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462605
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kolar, N., Milfelner, B., & Pisnik, A. (2024). Factors for customers’ AI use readiness in physical retail stores: The interplay of consumer attitudes and gender differences. Information, 15(6), 346–346. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060346
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2023). Marketing 6.0: The Future Is Immersive. John Wiley & Sons.
Kozak, J., & Fel, S. (2024). How sociodemographic factors relate to trust in artificial intelligence among students in Poland and the United Kingdom. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 28776. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80305-5
Lahusen, C., Maggetti, M., & Slavkovik, M. (2024). Trust, trustworthiness and AI governance. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 20752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71761-0
Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718756684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684
Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 Level: An extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 13922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3
Mou, Y., Xu, T., & Hu, Y. (2023). Uniqueness neglect on consumer resistance to AI. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41(6), 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2022-0505
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024). Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241229777. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241229777
Nguyen, D. S. W., & Shaik, M. M. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on corporate leadership. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2024.124004
Osman, Z., Mohamad, R. K., & Kasbun, N. (2024). What does it take to trigger intention to use artificial intelligence among students in higher education institutions? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(7), 1412–1429. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i7/22004
Pérez-Velasco, A. A., & Álvarez-Hernández, G. A. (2025). Repensando la Educación Superior: Apropiación de la Inteligencia Artificial en el Aprendizaje Universitario. Revista RedCA, 7(21), 236–236. https://doi.org/10.36677/redca.v7i21.24211
Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Nadlifatin, R. (2019). Understanding the Generation Z behavior on D-Learning: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(5), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9993
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024). Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework. Heliyon, 10(18), Article e37569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569
Sanmukhiya, C. (2020). A PLS –SEM approach to the UTAUT model: The case of Mauritius. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 6(1), Article 555677. https://doi.org/10.19080/asm.2020.06.555677
Savin, P. S., Rusu, G., Prelipcean, M., & Barbu, L. N. (2024). Cognitive shifts: Exploring the impact of AI on Generation Z and millennials. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 18(1), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0019
Scantamburlo, T., Cortés, À., Foffano, F., Barrué, C., Distefano, V., Pham, L., & Fabris, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence across Europe: A study on awareness, attitude and trust. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2024.3461633
Sergeeva, O. V., Zheltukhina, М. R., Shoustikova, T., Tukhvatullina, L. R., Dobrokhotov, D. A., & Kondrashev, S. (2025). Understanding higher education students’ adoption of generative AI technologies: An empirical investigation using UTAUT2. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), Article ep571. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16039
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
Sigfrids, A., Leikas, J., Salo-Pöntinen, H., & Koskimies, E. (2023). Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.976887
Smith, A. (2018, November 16). Public attitudes toward computer algorithms. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/16/public-attitudes-toward-computer-algorithms/
Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9
Stein, J.-P., Messingschlager, T., Gnambs, T., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2024). Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 2909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2
Thomson, S., Pickard-Jones, B., Baines, S., & Otermans, P. (2024). The impact of AI on education and careers: What do students think? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1457299
Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., & Pletnev, A. (2023). Network behavior as a specific feature of generation Z communicative competence and their readiness for online learning. Journal on Interactive Systems, 14(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2023.3034
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wang, C., Ahmad, S. F., Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., Awwad, E. M., Irshad, M., Ali, Y. A., Al‐Razgan, M., Khan, Y., & Han, H. (2023). An empirical evaluation of technology acceptance model for Artificial Intelligence in E-commerce. Heliyon, 9(8), Article e18349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18349
Wang, W., & Siau, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, robotics, future of work and future of humanity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Database Management (JDM), 30(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2019010104
Wang, Y. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence technology in promoting socio-economic development. Journal of Progress in Engineering and Physical Science, 3(3), 85–93.
Ward, B., Bhati, D., Neha, F., & Guercio, A. (2025). Analyzing the impact of AI tools on student study habits and academic performance. In 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 434–440). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccwc62904.2025.10903692
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). “To Use or Not to Use?” A mixed-methods study on the determinants of EFL college learners’ behavioral intention to use AI in the distributed learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7708
Zhang, Z., Genc, Y., Xing, A., Wang, D., Fan, X., & Citardi, D. (2020). Lay individuals’ perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered healthcare systems. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e326. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.326
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.