The roles of withdrawal in the negotiator personality-tactic relationship

    Pui Ting Chow Info
    Sai On Cheung Info
    Chiu Yan Young Info
    Chi Kit Wah Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.761646

Abstract

The personality of a negotiator shall affect his choice of tactics. Moreover, mixed predictions of the personality-tactic relationship have been derived from prior studies. One possible explanation is the influence of other intervening factors. In this regard, this study examines the role of withdrawal, as an intervening variable, in the negotiator personality-tactic relationship. State of withdrawal refers to the level of interest to continue with a negotiation. In a state of complete withdrawal, the interest to continue no longer exists and breakdown of the negotiation is inevitable. With the participation of practicing professionals, an experiment was used to collect data for the study. It was found that competitors are prone to withdraw and use more distributive tactics. However, this pattern changes with the composition of the dyad. If the negotiating counterpart is a cooperator, a competitor will adopt a more integrative approach. This finding reminds the importance of the personality factor in selecting members of a negotiating team.

Keywords:

personality, organization, strategy, strategic management, tactic, withdrawal, negotiator behavior, negotiation outcome

How to Cite

Chow, P. T., Cheung, S. O., Young, C. Y., & Wah, C. K. (2015). The roles of withdrawal in the negotiator personality-tactic relationship. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(4), 808-821. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.761646

Share

Published in Issue
September 10, 2015
Abstract Views
876

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2015-09-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chow, P. T., Cheung, S. O., Young, C. Y., & Wah, C. K. (2015). The roles of withdrawal in the negotiator personality-tactic relationship. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(4), 808-821. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.761646

Share