Unveiling leadership dynamics and tournament incentives: insights from the environmental misconduct of Chinese listed companies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2025.25564Abstract
This study investigates whether the tournament compensation motivate executives to adopt environmentally responsible practices and reduce environmental violations. Focusing on CEO characteristics, we also examine whether politically connected CEOs and CEO gender enhance the effectiveness of these incentives in mitigating corporate environmental violations. Using a fixed-effects model, two stage least square (2-SLS) and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) on data from Chinese companies, spanning from 2010 to 2023, this study finds that executive tournament incentives play a significant role in reducing environmental violations. Our results further reveal that political connections and female CEOs strengthen the negative relationship between tournament incentives and environmental violations, demonstrating the critical influence of leadership diversity and institutional ties in driving corporate sustainability. Additionally, our findings provide robust support for tournament theory, highlighting the pivotal role of CEOs in shaping corporate environmental behaviour. This study provides pertinent insights for regulators and policymakers, assisting them to develop tailored strategies, regulations and legislative frameworks to reduce environmental violations and improve sustainable development.
Keywords:
corporate environmental violation, CEO tournament incentives, tournament theory, political connection, CEO gender, ChinaHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ali, S., Zhang, J., Usman, M., Khan, M. K., Khan, F. U., & Siddique, M. A. (2020). Do tournament incentives motivate chief executive officers to be socially responsible? Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(5), 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2019-2288
Arena, C., Michelon, G., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Big egos can be green: A study of CEO hubris and environmental innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12250
Cao, X., Lemmon, M., Pan, X., Qian, M., & Tian, G. (2019). Political promotion, CEO incentives, and the relationship between pay and performance. Management Science, 65(7), 2947–3448. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2966
Chircop, J., Tarsalewska, M., & Trzeciakiewicz, A. (2025). Learning to be green: Accounting comparability and environmental violations. The British Accounting Review, 57(5) Article 101240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101240
Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01598.x
Elsayed, N., & Elbardan, H. (2018). Investigating the associations between executive compensation and firm performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2015-0027
Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross‐country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x
Fan, H., & Chen, L. (2022). Political connections, business strategy and tax aggressiveness: Evidence from China. China Accounting and Finance Review, 25(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAFR-07-2022-0086
Fuchs, F. E., Franz, C. A., Fischer-Kreer, D., Greven, A., & Brettel, M. (2024). Too afraid to act? How CEO Political ideological divergence influences environmental innovation. Organization and Environment, 37(4), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266241268343
Gong, G., & Yang, N. (2025). Do corporate environmental violations affect trade credit? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 64, Article 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101236
Gu, Y., Ho, K.-C., Yan, C., & Gozgor, G. (2021). Public environmental concern, CEO turnover, and green investment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 100, Article 105379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105379
He, L. R., & Fang, J. X. (2016). Subnational institutional contingencies and executive pay dispersion. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 371–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9429-9
Huang, C. J., Wan Ahmad, W. N., & Saad, R. A. J. (2025). Can female CEOs improve corporate environmental, social and governance performance? Gender in Management, 40(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-11-2023-0450
Javed, M., Wang, F., Usman, M., Gull, A. A., & Zaman, Q. U. (2023). Female CEOs and green innovation. Journal of Business Research, 157, Article 113515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113515
Jiang, X., & Akbar, A. (2018). Does increased representation of female executives improve corporate environmental investment? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(12), Article 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124750
Jin, Y., Wang, S., Cheng, X., & Zeng, H. (2024). Can environmental tax reform curb corporate environmental violations? A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s “environmental fees to taxes”. Journal of Business Research, 171, Article 114388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114388
Kagzi, M., Dagar, V., Doytch, N., Krishnan, D., & Raj, M. (2024). Curbing environmental degradation to balance sustainable development: Evidence from China. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24, Article 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100465
Khalid, F., Curseu, P. L., Voinea, C. L., Sun, X., & Srivastava, M. (2025). Green investing and corporate environmental violations: Do CEO ability and female directors matter? Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12782
Khan, F. U., Ullah, S., Rauf, F., Zhang, J., & Harangus, D. (2024a). Environmental ethics unveiled: Navigating the nexus between government divestiture and environmental investment. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12763
Khan, F. U., Zhang, J., Saeed, I., & Ullah, S. (2024b). Do institutional contingencies matter for green investment? – An institution based view of Chinese listed companies. Heliyon, 10(1) Article e23456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23456
Khan, F. U., Zhang, J., Ullah, S., Usman, M., & Ali, S. (2022). How government withdrawal affects corporate social performance?¿ Cómo afecta la disminución de la participación estatal a los resultados sociales de las empresas? Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 25(1), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.399841
Khan, M. K., Ali, S., Zahid, R. A., Huo, C., & Nazir, M. S. (2022). Does whipping tournament incentives spur CSR performance? An empirical evidence from Chinese sub-national institutional contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 841163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841163
Kong, L., Lonare, G., & Nart, A. (2022). Industry tournament incentives and corporate innovation strategies. Journal of Financial Research, 45(1), 124–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12270
Larrieta‐Rubín de Celis, I., Velasco‐Balmaseda, E., Fernández de Bobadilla, S., Alonso‐Almeida, M. d. M., & Intxaurburu‐Clemente, G. (2015). Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12081
Lee, P., Kleinman, G., & Anandarajan, A. (2025). The effect of tournament incentives on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 22, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00236-5
Lim, M. H., & Chung, J. Y. (2021). The effects of female chief executive officers on corporate social responsibility. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(5), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3304
Lingaitienė, O., Merkevičius, J., & Davidavičienė, V. (2021). The model of vehicle and route selection for energy saving. Sustainability, 13(8), Article 4528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084528
Liu, M., Luo, X., & Lu, W.-Z. (2023). Public perceptions of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) based on social media data: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner production, 387, Article 135840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135840
Luo, X. R., & Wang, D. (2021). Are politically endorsed firms more socially responsible? Selective engagement in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04367-6
Ma, M., Pan, J., & Stubben, S. R. (2020). The effect of local tournament incentives on firms’ performance, risk-taking decisions, and financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52506
Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, A., Butkus, M., & Davidavičienė, V. (2022). Development of the model to examine the impact of infrastructure on economic growth and convergence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17140
Maoret, M., Moreira, S., & Sabanci, H. (2024). Closing the Gender Pay Gap: Analyst coverage, stakeholder attention, and gender differences in executive compensation. Organization Studies, 45(4), 495–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231200725
Nalebuff, B. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003535
Ouyang, Z., Lv, R., & Liu, Y. (2023). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during corporate environmental violation events? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1942–1952. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2465
Park, J., & Kim, S. (2017). Pay dispersion and organizational performance in Korea: Curvilinearity and the moderating role of congruence with organizational culture. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(9), 1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1126331
Paul, J. (2024). Mediating factors between CEO Power and organizational outcomes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387105983_Mediating_Factors_Between_CEO_Power_and_Organizational_Outcomes
Preuss, S., & Königsgruber, R. (2021). How do corporate political connections influence financial reporting? A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1), Article 106802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106802
Shahab, Y., Hussain, T., Wang, P., Zhong, M., & Kumar, S. (2023). Business groups and environmental violations: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 85, Article 102459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102459
Sun, L., Habib, A., & Huang, H. J. (2024). Business strategies and tournament incentives: Evidence from China. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 27(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211022755
Tang, F., & Li, D. (2024). Are female CEOs greener? Female CEOs and green innovation: The role of their political embeddedness. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 33(4), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12629
Ullah, S., Khan, F. U., Cismaș, L.-M., Usman, M., & Miculescu, A. (2022). Do tournament incentives matter for CEOs to be environmentally responsible? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), Article 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010470
Usman, M., Ishaque, M., Gull, A. A., & Tawiah, V. (2024). Partial privatisation and green innovation in China: The role of industrial context and regional development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6814–6832. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3834
Vieito, J. P. T. (2012). Gender, top management compensation gap, and company performance: Tournament versus behavioral theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00878.x
Wang, K., & Jiang, W. (2021). State ownership and green innovation in China: The contingent roles of environmental and organizational factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, Article 128029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
Wu, H., Li, S., Ying, S. X., & Chen, X. (2018). Politically connected CEOs, firm performance, and CEO pay. Journal of Business Research, 91, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.003
Wu, Y. (2023). Do political incentives promote or inhibit corporate social responsibility? The role of local officials’ tenure. PLoS ONE, 18(3), Article e0283183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283183
Wu, Y., & Tham, J. (2023). The impact of executive green incentives and top management team characteristics on corporate value in China: The mediating role of environment, social and government
performance. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612518
Zhao, X., Zhou, G., & Rezaee, Z. (2023). Tournament incentives and corporate social responsibility performance. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 38(4), 934–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211022946
Zhu, N., Zhang, S., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Impacts of Environmental Regulation on Corporate ESG Performance–Evidence from China. Romanian Journal for Economic Forecasting, 26(3), 62–82.
Zou, H., Xie, E., & Mei, N. (2023). Political connections and firms’ trade credit in emerging economies. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 39(3), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2022-0513
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.