Urban distances, individual resources, and migrant entrepreneurship: a configurational analysis in China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2025.24712Abstract
Given its significance for economic and social sustainability, migrant entrepreneurship (ME) has attracted increasing attention from scholars and policymakers. However, existing research provides limited insights into how various antecedents jointly affect ME. To address this gap, this study develops a theoretical model that integrates mixed embeddedness theory and entrepreneurial opportunity construction theory to explain the processes of opportunity construction and exploitation in ME. Using 130 cross-city migration cases in China – each comprising individuals from the same origin and destination cities – we examine how urban distances and individual resources jointly shape ME. The analysis identifies three pathways to high ME: the opportunity-resource endowed path, the resource bricolage path, and the opportunity-resource matching path. Although no single factor is necessary for high ME, greater geographic distance consistently promotes it. This study advances our understanding of the interplay between urban conditions, individual resources, and ME, and further enriches the mixed embeddedness theory by integrating the opportunity construction perspective.
Keywords:
migrant entrepreneurship, mixed embeddedness, urban distances, individual resources, opportunity construction, opportunity exploitation, configurational perspectiveHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Afandi, E., Kermani, M., & Mammadov, F. (2017). Social capital and entrepreneurial process. International Entrepreneurship & Management. 13(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0421-8
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
Bach, N. (2023). Regional informal institutions, local governance and internal migration in Vietnam. Regional Studies, 57(7), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2107191
Bhachu, P. (2017). Immigration and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Blennerhassett, C., Moore-Cherry, N., & Bonnin, C. (2022). Street markets, urban development and immigrant entrepreneurship: Unpacking precarity in Moore Street, Dublin. Urban Studies, 59(13), 2739–2755. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211040928
Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118
Dabić, M., Vlačić, B., Paul, J., Dana, L.-P., Sahasranamam, S., & Glinka, B. (2020). Immigrant entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.013
Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J. F. (2012). Liabilities of foreignness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.07.001
Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1150
Dheer, R. J. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship by immigrants: A review of existing literature and directions for future research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 555–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0506-7
Douglas, E. J., Shepherd, D. A., & Prentice, C. (2020). Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), Article 105970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105970
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304
Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2004). The impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.07.001
Falck, O., Lameli, A., & Ruhose, J. (2018). Cultural biases in migration: Estimating non-monetary migration costs. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 411–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12243
Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces 2011 report. Economic Science Press.
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Fraudatario, M. C., Giordano, G., & Zaccaria, A. M. (2025). Beyond mixed embeddedness: Multilevel personal networks of migrant entrepreneurs in Naples and Manchester. International Migration, 63(2), Article e13262. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13262
Fu, W. (2020). Spatial mobility and opportunity-driven entrepreneurship: The evidence from China labor-force dynamics survey. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(5), 1324–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09746-9
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2020). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–140, 142–147, 162.
Greckhamer, T. (2016). CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions. Strategic Management Jounal, 37(4), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2370
Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
Guerrero, M., Mandakovic, V., Apablaza, M., & Arriagada, V. (2021). Are migrants in/from emerging economies more entrepreneurial than natives? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00714-6
Jones, T., Ram, M., & Villares-Varela, M. (2019). Diversity, economic development and new migrant entrepreneurs. Urban Studies, 56(5), 960–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018765382
Judge, W. Q., Fainshmidt, S., & Brown, J. L. (2020). Institutional systems for equitable wealth creation: Replication and an update of Judge et al. (2014). Management and Organization Review, 16(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.1
Kemeny, T., & Cooke, A. (2017). Urban immigrant diversity and inclusive institutions. Economic Geography, 93(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1300056
Kloosterman, R. C. (2010). Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220488
Linder, C., Lechner, C., & Pelzel, F. (2020). Many roads lead to Rome: How human, social, and financial capital are related to new venture survival. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 909–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719867558
Liu, C. Y., Ye, L., & Feng, B. (2019). Migrant entrepreneurship in China: Entrepreneurial transition and firm performance. Small Business Economics, 52, 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9979-y
Mao, Q., & Mao, X. (2021). Cultural barriers, institutional distance, and spatial spillovers: Evidence from regional industrial evolution in China. Growth and Change, 52(3), 1440–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12527
Mago, S. (2023). Migrant entrepreneurship, social integration and development in Africa. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(3), 413–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1794666
Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Smith, A. R. (2015). Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.004
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
Mrożewski, M. J., & Hering, D. (2023). What makes migrants more entrepreneurial? Investigating the role of cultural distance and human capital. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00813-6
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). Statistical Bulletin of the Seventh National Population Census of China. China Statistics Press.
Nguyen, B. (2023). Regional informal institutions, local governance and internal migration in Vietnam. Regional Studies, 57(7), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2107191
Nguyen, B. (2021). Regional informal institutions, local governance and gendered entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(7), 1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1889489
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Ram, M., Jones, T., & Villares-Varela, M. (2017). Migrant entrepreneurship: Reflections on research and practice. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616678051
Sarason, Y., Dean, T., & Dillard, J. F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
Solano, G., Ram, M., & Rath, J. (2023). Regulation of migrant entrepreneurship: The strained conjunction of laws, policies and practices. International Migration, 61(2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13128
Solano, G., Schutjens, V., & Rath, J. (2022). Multifocality and opportunity structure: Towards a mixed embeddedness model for transnational migrant entrepreneurship. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00270-0
Sousa, C. M. P., & Bradley, F. (2008). Cultural distance and psychic distance: Refinements in conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5–6), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X325959
Su, H.-N., & Moaniba, I. M. (2020). Does geographic distance to partners affect firm R&D spending? The moderating roles of individuals, firms, and countries. Journal of Business Research, 106, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.040
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001
Tasavori, M., Kwong, C., & Pruthi, S. (2020). Resource bricolage and growth of product and market scope in social enterprises. In Social entrepreneurship and bricolage (pp. 75–100). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429263767-4
Tokas, K., & Deb, A. K. (2020). CAGE distance framework and bilateral trade flows: Case of India. Management Research Review, 43(10), 1157–1181. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2019-0386
Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Liu, S. (2017). China labor-force dynamics survey: Design and practice. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 2(3–4), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397200917735796
Wang, Y., & Warn, J. (2018). Chinese immigrant entrepreneurship: Embeddedness and the interaction of resources with the wider social and economic context. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 36(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617726364
Xie, Z., Wang, X., Xie, L., & Duan, K. (2021a). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and the quality and quantity of regional entrepreneurship: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 128, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.015
Xie, Z., Wang, X., Xie, L., Dun, S., & Li, J. (2021b). Institutional context and female entrepreneurship: A country-based comparison using fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 132, 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.045
Yang, H., & Zhang, X. (2023). Persistence of culture: How the entrepreneurial culture of origin contributes to migrant entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 61(3), 1179–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00699-2
Ye, W., Li, X., & Zhu, H. (2018). Regional disparities, social embeddedness, and cross-regional entrepreneurship: A study on the phenomenon of “over-river dragons” entrepreneurs. Management World, (01), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.01.013
Zhang, P., Wei, X., & Mao, G. (2024). Cultural diversity, social integration, and migrant entrepreneurship – evidence from the China migrants dynamic survey. Small Business Economics, 62(3), 1135–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00791-1
Zhou, Z., Li, B., & Yi, C. (2022). Out-group discrimination and migrant workers’ entrepreneurship. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Science), 75(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2022.01.012
Zou, J., & Deng, X. (2023). The association between settlement intention and migrant entrepreneurship in China: Explanation from human capital and risk aversion. Habitat International, 137, Article 102852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102852
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.