From theory to action: what motivates consumers to purchase IoT sustainable products
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2025.24211Abstract
In an era marked by the importance of sustainability and technological integration, this paper explores the drivers behind sustainable consumption in a rapidly evolving market, focusing on Romanian consumer perspectives towards sustainable products driven by the relationship between the circular economy and the Internet of Things (IoT). Leveraging structural equation modelling, we conduct a thorough survey to investigate the roles of shaping purchase behaviors within the context of the circular economy and IoT integration. The findings reveal that while environmental attitudes significantly influence purchase intentions, price sensitivity and perceived value play a crucial role in shaping consumer choices. From a theoretical perspective, this study highlights the interplay between sustainability concerns and market dynamics, contributing to the broader understanding of sustainable purchase behavior. From a managerial perspective, the results provide actionable insights for businesses to design value-aligned strategies, ensuring that sustainable products are both accessible and appealing to a diverse consumer base. This dual focus on theory and practice offers a roadmap for fostering responsible consumption in a competitive marketplace.
Keywords:
technology readiness, attitude, purchase intention, IoT, sustainability, structural equation modellingHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. (2021). Circular economy ecosystems: A typology, definitions, and implications. In S. Teerikangas, T. Onkila, K. Koistinen, & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), Research handbook of sustainability agency (pp. 260–276). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906035.00024
Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Green products: An exploratory study on consumer behavior in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075
Blas Riesgo, S., Codina, M., & Sádaba, T. (2023). Does Sustainability matter to fashion consumers? Clustering fashion consumers and their purchasing behavior in Spain. Fashion Practice, 15(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2051297
Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00680-8
Calvo-Porral, C., & Lévy-Mangín, J. P. (2020). The circular economy business model: Examining consumers’ acceptance of recycled goods. Administrative Sciences, 10(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10020028
Camacho-Otero, J., Tunn, V. S., Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2020). Consumers in the circular economy. In M. Brandão, D. Lazarevic, & G. Finnveden (Eds.), Handbook of the circular economy (pp. 74–87). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972727.00014
Camilleri, M. A., Cricelli, L., Mauriello, R., & Strazzullo, S. (2023). Consumer perceptions of sustainable products: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118923
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018). Marketing approaches for a circular economy: Using design frameworks to interpret online communications. Sustainability, 10(6), Article 2070. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062070
Chatterjee, D., & Bolar, K. (2018). Determinants of mobile Wallet Intentions to use: The mental cost perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(10), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1505697
Chekima, B., Wafa, S. a. W. S. K., Igau, O. A., Chekima, S., & Sondoh, S. L. (2016). Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3436–3450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.102
Chepurna, M., & Criado, J. R. (2018). Identification of barriers to co-create online: The perspectives of customers and companies. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(4), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2018-0018
Conner, S. L., Reardon, J., Miller, C., Salciuviene, L., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2017). Cultural antecedents to the normative, affective, and cognitive effects of domestic versus foreign purchase behavior. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1220975
Constantinescu, R., & Muntean, D. (2022). Circular economy: Adopting new green trends in marketing for a sustainable consumer experience based on the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0132
Corvellec, H., & Stål, H. (2017). Evidencing the waste effect of Product-Service Systems (PSSs). Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.033
Ćwiklicki, M., & Wojnarowska, M. (2020). Circular economy and industry 4.0: One-way or two-way relationships? Engineering Economics, 31(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.4.24565
Diddi, S., & Niehm, L. S. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in the retail apparel context: Exploring consumers’ personal and normative influences on patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing Channels, 23(1–2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046669X.2016.1147892
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1–7. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools usage: a structural equation modeling of undergraduates’ technological readiness, self-efficacy and attitudes. Journal for STEM Education Research, 8, 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1
Ganesh, K. R., & Nagadeepa, C. (2024). Perceived value and affordability: Examining the interplay in consumers’ purchase intention of IoT gadgets. In AI in business: Opportunities and limitations (vol. 2, pp. 165–176). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49544-1_14
Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R., & Grechi, D. (2020). Trends in the fashion industry. The perception of sustainability and circular economy: A gender/generation quantitative approach. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072809
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., De Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159
Gillingham, K., & Palmer, K. (2014). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Policy insights from economic theory and empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ret021
Hasan, M. R., Chowdhury, N. I., Rahman, M. H., Syed, M. A. B., & Ryu, J. (2023). Analysis of the user perception of chatbots in education using a partial least squares structural equation modeling approach. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.03636
Hossan, D., Dato’Mansor, Z., & Jaharuddin, N. S. (2023). Research population and sampling in quantitative study. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship (IJBT), 13(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263
Hwang, J. (2016). Organic food as self-presentation: The role of psychological motivation in older consumers’ purchase intention of organic food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.01.007
Isik, A., & Yasar, M. F. (2015). Effects of brand on consumer preferences: A study in Turkmenistan. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 8(16), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.17015/ejbe.2015.016.08
In, F. C., & Ahmad, A. Z. (2018, September). The effect of demographic factors on consumer intention to purchase green personal care products. In Proceeding of INSIGHT 2018 1st International Conference on Religion, Social Sciences and Technological Education (pp. 25–26).
Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase intention to sustainable apparel products: Exploring consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” gap. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051770
Kazeminia, A., Hultman, M., & Mostaghel, R. (2016). Why pay more for sustainable services? The case of ecotourism. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4992–4997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.069
Kim, N., & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of Eco-Friendly products: the moderating impact of situational context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), Article 5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075312
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Kolade, O., Odumuyiwa, V., Abolfathi, S., Schröder, P., Wakunuma, K., Akanmu, I., & Oyinlola, M. (2022). Technology acceptance and readiness of stakeholders for transitioning to a circular plastic economy in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, Article 121954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121954
Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., Kumar, A., Nasco, S. A., & Clark, T. (2007). Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology. Psychology & Marketing, 24(12), 1059–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20196
Lakatos, E. S., Cioca, L., Dan, V., Ciomoş, A., Crisan, O. A., & Bârsan, G. (2018). Studies and investigation about the attitude towards sustainable production, consumption and waste generation in line with circular economy in Romania. Sustainability, 10(3), Article 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030865
Lieder, M., Asif, F. M. A., Rashid, A., Mihelič, A., & Kotnik, S. (2018). A conjoint analysis of circular economy value propositions for consumers: Using “washing machines in Stockholm” as a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.147
Michaelidou, N., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Antecedents of attitude and intention towards counterfeit symbolic and experiential products. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(9–10), 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.549189
Mohd Suki, N. (2016). Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2893–2910. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295
Mostaghel, R., & Chirumalla, K. (2021). Role of customers in circular business models. Journal of Business Research, 127, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.053
Musova, Z., Musa, H., Drugdova, J., Lazaroiu, G., & Alayasa, J. (2021). Consumer attitudes towards new circular models in the fashion industry. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), Article 111. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.03.07
Negm, E. (2023). Internet of Things (IoT) acceptance model – assessing consumers’ behavior toward the adoption intention of IoT. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-09-2022-0183
Oh, J., & Yoon, S. J. (2014). Theory‐based approach to factors affecting ethical consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12092
Pace, D. S. (2021). Probability and non-probability sampling-an entry point for undergraduate researchers. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 9(2), 1–15.
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2009). Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.033
Pinochet, L. H. C., Lopes, E. L., Srulzon, C. H. F., & Onusic, L. M. (2018). The influence of the attributes of “Internet of Things” products on functional and emotional experiences of purchase intention. Innovation & Management Review, 15(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0028
Pisitsankkhakarn, R., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2020). Enhancing purchase intention in circular economy: An empirical evidence of remanufactured automotive product in Thailand. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, Article 104702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104702
Ramlall, I. (2016). Benefits of SEM. IN Applied structural equation modelling for researchers and practitioners (pp. 15–17). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78635-883-720161004
Rehman, Z. U., Seman, N. A. A., & Harun, A. (2024). Exploring intention to purchase green products using the theory of reasoned action: Testing the moderating effect of price sensitivity. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8, 1649–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-024-00451-1
Roy, S. K., Balaji, M. S., Quazi, A., & Quaddus, M. (2018). Predictors of customer acceptance of and resistance to smart technologies in the retail sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.02.005
Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Parasuraman, A., & Papadopoulos, N. (2017). Demographics, attitudes, and technology readiness: A cross-cultural analysis and model validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2015-0163
Shamsudin, M. F., Hassim, A. A., & Abd Manaf, S. (2024). Mastering probability and non-probability methods for accurate research insights. Journal of Postgraduate Current Business Research, 9(1), 38–53.
Scheller, F., Morrissey, K., Neuhoff, K., & Keles, D. (2024). Green or greedy: The relationship between perceived benefits and homeowners’ intention to adopt residential low-carbon technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 108, Article 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103388
Szentesi, S. G., Cuc, L. D., Lile, R., & Cuc, P. N. (2021). Internet of Things (IoT), challenges and perspectives in Romania: A qualitative research. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(57), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/57/448
Shevchenko, Т., Saidani, M., Ranjbari, M., Kronenberg, J., Danko, Y., & Laitala, K. (2023). Consumer behavior in the circular economy: Developing a product-centric framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, Article 135568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135568
Singhal, A., & Malik, G. (2018). The attitude and purchasing of female consumers towards green marketing related to cosmetic industry. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 12(3), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-11-2017-0063
Szilagyi, A., Cioca, L. I., Bacali, L., Lakatos, E. S., & Birgovan, A. L. (2022). Consumers in the circular economy: A path analysis of the underlying factors of purchasing behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), Article 11333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811333
Testa, F., Iovino, R., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The circular economy and consumer behaviour: The mediating role of information seeking in buying circular packaging. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3435–3448. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2587
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
Tuyet, T. T., & Tuan, N. M. (2019). The relationships of technology readiness, perceived value, satisfaction, and continuance intention – A study of self-service technologies in Viet Nam. Science & Technology Development Journal: Economics-Law & Management, 3(SI), SI24–SI34. https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjelm.v3iSI.608
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Vy, P. D., Dinh, T., Vu, L. T., & Pham, L. (2022). Customers’ perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty in online securities trading: Do moderating effects of technology readiness matter? International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJESMA.295962
Yieh, K., Chen, J., & Wei, M. B. (2012). The effects of technology readiness on customer perceived value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9314-3
Zhang, N., Liu, R., Zhang, X., & Pang, Z. (2021). The impact of consumer perceived value on repeat purchase intention based on online reviews: by the method of text mining. Data Science and Management, 3, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.09.001
Zhang, Y., Xiao, C., & Zhou, G. (2020). Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, Article 118555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118555
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.