Share:


Collaborative learning and individual work performance in coworking spaces

    Kolja Oswald   Affiliation
    ; Xiaokang Zhao Affiliation

Abstract

Coworking spaces are becoming increasingly popular. Throughout literature, coworking spaces are commonly known as collaborative environments. Yet, there is a lack of research on the mechanisms of the collaborative practices within coworking spaces. This research identifies collaborative learning as a major collaborative practice within coworking spaces, and develops a conceptual framework including two other variables: individual motivation to learn and individual work performance. Exploratory factor analysis to establish the reliability and validity of this framework. Next, a survey study was conducted of 169 coworking space members and PLS-SEM was used to do a factor analysis and evaluate the structural model created. It is found that individual motivation to learn positively impacts collaborative learning, collaborative learning positively impacts individual work performance, and that collaborative learning acts as a full mediator between individual motivation to learn and individual work performance. These findings demonstrate how collaborative learning can be key in improving individual work performance in coworking spaces. Furthermore, these findings position collaborative learning as a theory that deserves further attention in coworking space research. These findings also suggest that coworking space operators may want to further encourage collaboration and incentivize learning in their space.


First published online 14 December 2021

Keyword : coworking, coworking space, collaboration, collaborative learning, urban entrepreneurship, individual work performance

How to Cite
Oswald, K., & Zhao, X. (2022). Collaborative learning and individual work performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15692
Published in Issue
Jan 24, 2022
Abstract Views
1269
PDF Downloads
994
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002

Bilandzic, M. V. (2013). The embodied hybrid space: Designing social and digital interventions to facilitate connected learning in coworking spaces. Queensland University of Technology. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16749371.pdf

Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040

Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED465870

Blagoev, B., Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2019). “We are all herd animals”: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization, 26(6), 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008

Boud, D., Garrick, J., & Greenfield, K. (2000). Understanding learning at work. Performance Improvement, 39(10), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140391013

Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Qiu, Y. (2021). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010

Bouncken, R., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R., & Kraus, S. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.033

Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2018). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

Butcher, T. (2018). Learning everyday entrepreneurial practices through coworking. Management Learning, 49(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618757088

Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121

Capdevila, I. (2014). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502816

Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 1540004. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502813

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Clifton, N., Füzi, A., & Loudon, G. (2019). Coworking in the digital economy: Context, motivations, and outcomes. Futures, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102439

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Comunian, R., & Jacobi, S. (2020). Growing collaborative creative learning spaces: The case of London School of Mosaic. In Collaborative spaces at work (pp. 268–281). Routledge. https://taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429329425-20/growing-collaborative-creative-learning-spaces-roberta-comunian-silvie-jacobi

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol10/iss1/7/

DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190240/document

Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630

Foertsch, C. (2019). 2019 state of coworking: Over 2 million coworking space members expected. DESKMAG. http://www.deskmag.com/en/2019-state-of-coworking-spaces-2-million-members-growth-crisis-market-report-survey-study

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

Fost, D. (2008, February 21). Coworking: A cooperative for the modern age. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/technology/21iht-cowork.1.10263648.html

Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581

Goermar, L., Barwinski, R. W., Bouncken, R. B., & Laudien, S. M. (2021). Co-Creation in coworking-spaces: Boundary conditions of diversity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1740627

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2233795

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. 3.0.CO;2-7> https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7

Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433539

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Work, 48(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-131659

Kubátová, J. (2014). The cause and impact of the development of coworking in the current knowledge economy. In C. Vivas & P. Sequeiro (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 571–577). Santarem, Portugal.

Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919

Macneil, C. (2001). The supervisor as a facilitator of informal learning in work teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(6), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005724

Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera, 15(2), 121–139. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/14478/

Merkel, J. (2017). Coworking and innovation. In H. Bathelt, P. Cohendet, S. Henn, & L. Simon (Eds.), The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 570–586). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00046

Moilanen, J. (2012). Emerging hackerspaces – peer-production generation. In IFIP advances in information and communication technology: Vol. 378. Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability (pp. 94–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7

Orel, M., & Almeida, M. D. M. A. (2019). The ambience of collaboration in coworking environments. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 21(4). 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0050

Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x

Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47

Ramli, N. A., Latan, H., & Nartea, G. V. (2018). Why should PLS-SEM be used rather than regression? Evidence from the capital structure perspective. In Part of the international series in operations research & management science: Vol 267. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (pp. 171–209). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71691-6_6

Reio, Jr, T. G., & Wiswell, A. (2000). Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(1), 5–30. 3.0.CO;2-A> https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200021)11:1<5::AID-HRDQ2>3.0.CO;2-A

Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking: A community of work. Teorija in Praksa, 52(6), 1017–1038.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Henseler, J., & Hair, J. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007

Singh, B., Selvarajan, T. T., & Solansky, S. T. (2019). Coworker influence on employee performance: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0392

Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. https://www.evergreen.edu/sites/default/files/facultydevelopment/docs/WhatisCollaborativeLearning.pdf

Spinuzzi, C., Bodrožić, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about community”: But what is “Community” in coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1050651918816357

Tobias, S., & Carlson, J. E. (1969). Brief report: Bartlett’s test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4(3), 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0403_8

Waters-Lynch, J., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., & Hurley, J. (2016). Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2712217

Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32. http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V24/MB_V24_T1_Wong.pdf