The role of ICT in smart specialization of EU regions

    Małgorzata Dziembała   Affiliation
    ; Sylwia Talar   Affiliation


The aim of the paper is to answer the overriding question what is the role of ICT in implementation of smart specialization (SS) in EU regions (NUTS2 level)? This role can be dual and ICT is considered in this study both as an invention which has led to the emergence of new sector, and from the perspective of general purpose technology (GPT) properties where ICT plays the role of input in innovation process. There are used following methods and techniques: desk research, descriptive statistical analysis, the correlation measure and Hellwig’s method of taxonomic analysis. The main findings indicate that in practice SS in ICT is not focused on development ICT as invention and is not based on readiness to usage of ICT as GPT. However, the abilities of regions to take advantage of ICT as a driver of innovation (as GPT) are materially related to specialization in the ICT sector (development ICT as invention). The findings bring some improvements by evidence-based policy making. The research contribute to the better understanding of the innovation determinants during digital transformation and especially the base of specialization in ICT as GPT under SS assumptions.

Keyword : ICT, smart specialization, general purpose technologies, EU regions, sectoral specialization, innovation, taxonomic analysis

How to Cite
Dziembała, M., & Talar, S. (2021). The role of ICT in smart specialization of EU regions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(6), 1512-1530.
Published in Issue
Oct 29, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Arvanitis, S. (2005). Computerization, workplace organization, skilled labour and firm productivity: Evidence for the Swiss business sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(4), 225–249.

Balcerzak, A. P. (2016). Multiple-criteria evaluation of quality of human capital in the European Union countries. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 11–26.

Balicki, A. (2009). Statystyczna analiza wielowymiarowa i jej zastosowania społeczno-ekonomiczne [Statistical multivariate analysis and its socio-economic applications]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.

Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268.

Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F., Labory, S., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2020). Smart specialisation, Industry 4.0 and lagging regions: Some directions for policy. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 318–332.

Basile, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2012). Technological interdependence and regional growth in Europe: Proximity and synergy in knowledge spillovers. Papers in Regional Science, 91(4), 697–722.

Basu, S., & Fernald, J. G. (2007). Information and communications technology as a general-purpose technology: Evidence from U.S. industry data. German Economic Review, 8(2), 146–173.

Benner, M. (2020). Six additional questions about smart specialization: Implications for regional innovation policy 4.0. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1667–1684.

Bernhard, I., Gråsjö, U., & Karlsson, C. (Eds.) (2020). Diversity, innovation and clusters. Spatial perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation. A critical survey. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

Boschma, R. (2009). Evolutionary economic geography and its implications for regional innovation policy (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0912). Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography.

Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125.

Bresnahan, T. (2002). Prospects for an information-technology-led productivity surge. Innovation Policy & the Economy, 2, 135–161.

Bresnahan, T. (2010). General purpose technologies. In B. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 761–791). Elsevier.

Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies “Engine of growth”? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108.

Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406.

Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalised world (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Corò, G., & Volpe, M. (2020). Driving factors in the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies: An investigation of SMEs. In L. De Propris & D. Bailey (Eds), Industry 4.0 and regional transformations (1st ed., pp. 112–132). Routledge.

Corradini, C., Santini, E., & Vecciolini, C. (2021). The geography of Industry 4.0 technologies across European regions. Regional Studies, Ahead-of-Print, 1–14.

Cortinovis, N., & Oort, F. (2015). Variety, economic growth and knowledge intensity of European regions: A spatial panel analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 7–32.

Crespo, J., Balland, P. A., Rigby, D., & Boschma, R. (2017). Regional diversification opportunities and smart specialization strategies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

De Castro, E. A., & Jensen-Butler, Ch. (2003). Demand for information and communication technology based services and regional economic development. Papers in Regional Science, 82(1), 27–50.

Edler, J. (2016). The impact of policy measures to stimulate private demand for innovation. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, & P. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 318–354). Edward Elgar.

Edquist H., & Henrekson, M. (2006). Technological breakthroughs and productivity growth. In A. J. Field, G. Clark, & W. A. Sundstrom (Eds.), Research in Economic History (Vol. 24, pp. 1–53).

European Commission. (2017). Regional innovation scoreboard 2017. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2019a). Regional innovation scoreboard 2019. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2019b). Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2019. Methodology report. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union.

Falk, M. (2005). ICT-linked firm reorganisation and productivity gains. Technovation, 25(11), 1229–1250.

Fan, P., Urs, N., & Hamlin, R. E. (2019). Rising innovative city-regions in a transitional economy: A case study of ICT industry in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Technology in Society, 58, 101139.

Foray, D. (2016). On the policy space of smart specialization strategies. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1428–1437.

Foray, D. (2019). In response to “Six critical questions about smart spezialisation”. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2066–2078.

Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9, 1–5.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933.

Gaspar, J., & Glaeser, E. L. (1998). Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(1), 136–156.

Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2020). Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 54(10), 1377–1388.

Hall, B., & Khan, B. (2003). Adoption of new technology (NBER Working Paper No. 9730). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065.

Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr [Application of the taxonomic method for the typological division of countries according to their level of develop-ment and structure of qualified personnel]. Przegląd Statystyczny, 15(4), 307–327.

Hellwig, Z. (1972). Procedure of evaluating high-level manpower data and typology of countries by means of the taxonomic method. In Z. Gostkowski (Ed.), Towards a system of human resources indicators for less developed countries: Papers prepared for a UNESCO Research Project (pp. 115–134). The Polish Academy of Sciences Press.

Hinloopen, J., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa Index. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137, 1–35.

Hollenstein, H. (2004). Determinants of the adoption of information and communication technologies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15(3), 315–342.

Jakobi, A. (2012). Complex regional assessment possibilities of competitiveness of the information economy and society in Hungary: From regional statistics to regional policy. European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Conference papers. Louvain-la-Neuve.

Karlsson, C., Maier, G., Trippl, M., Siedschlag, I., Owen, R., Murphy, G., & Bogdanowicz, M. (2010). ICT and regional economic dynamics: A literature review. European Commission. EUR 24510 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.

Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2015). Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: Can “smart specialization” make a difference? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 8(2), 172–187.

Kijek, T., & Kijek, A. (2019). Is innovation the key to solving the productivity paradox? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 219–225.

Kleibrink, A., Niehaves, B., Palop, P., Sörvik, J., & Thapa, B. (2015). Regional ICT innovation in the European Union: Prioritization and performance (2008–2012). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 320–333.

Kroll, H., Muller, E., Schnabl, E., & Zenker, A. (2014). From smart concept to challenging practice: How European regions deal with the Commission’s request for novel innovation strategies (Working Papers Firms and Region, R2/2014). Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

Liao, H., Wang, B., Li, B., & Weyman-Jones, T. (2016). ICT as a general-purpose technology: The productivity of ICT in the United States revisited. Information Economics and Policy, 36, 10–25.

Lipsey, R. G., Carlaw, K. I., & Bekar, C. T. (2005). Economic transformations: General Purpose Technologies and long-term economic growth. Oxford University Press.

Lopes, J., Ferreira, J. J., & Farinha, L. (2019). Innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3): Past, present and future research. Growth and Change, 50(1), 38–68.

Lundström, N., & Mäenpää, A. (2017). Wicked game of smart specialization: A player’s handbook. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1357–1374.

Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.

Mas, M., Fernández De Guevara Radoselovics, J., Robledo, J. C., & López-Cobo, M. (2017). The 2017 PREDICT key facts report. An analysis of ICT R&D in the EU and beyond. JRC Technical Reports, JRC112019, EUR 28594 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815.

McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.

Mierzwa, Z. (2017). Implementation of multivariate statistical analysis for warning forecasting. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 5(4), 22–36.

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2007). Information economy – sector definitions based on the International Standard Industry Classification (ISIC 4). Working Party on Indicators for the Information Society (WPIIS). DSTI/ICCP/IIS(2006)2/FINAL, JT03223017.

Panek, T. (2009). Statystyczne metody wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej [Statistical methods of multivariate comparative analysis]. Warsaw School of Economics [SGH]. Warsaw, Poland.

Peine, A., & Herrmann, A. M. (2012). The sources of use knowledge: Towards integrating the dynamics of technology use and design in the articulation of societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1495–512.

Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166.

Radosevic, S., Curaj, A., Gheorghiu, R., Andreescu, L., & Wade, I. (Eds.) (2017). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (1st ed.). Academic Press, Elsevier.

Rajaraman, V. (2018). Breakthroughs in information and communication technologies – Part I. Reson, 23, 787–808.

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2015). Institutions and the entrepreneurial discovery process for smart specialization. In Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1523. Utrecht University. Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning. Group Economic Geography.

Rosenberg, N., & Trajtenberg, M. (2004). A general-purpose technology at work: The Corliss steam engine in the late-nineteenth-century United States. The Journal of Economic History, 64(1), 61–99.

Smart specialization platform. (2020). aEye@RIS3: Innovation priorities in Europe. European Commission.

Todeva, E. (2015). Market-driven clusters as prerequisites and consequences of smart specialisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 250–269.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). Technology and innovation report 2018: Harnessing frontier technologies for sustainable development. UNCTAD. United Nations Publication.

Van Ark, B. (2014). Productivity and digitalisation in Europe: Paving the road to faster growth. Lisbon Council Policy Brief, 8(1). The Lisbon Council, Brussels.

Van Welsum, D., Overmeer, W., & Van Ark, B. (2013). Unlocking the ICT growth potential in Europe: Enabling people and businesses. Using scenarios to build a new narrative for the role of ICT in growth in Europe (Final main report). The Conference Board. European Commission.