Risky multi-criteria group decision making on green capacity investment projects based on supply chain

    Yan Song Info
    Shuang Yao Info
    Donghua Yu Info
    Yan Shen Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1331461

Abstract

Green capacity investment projects have rapidly emerged involving suppliers, customers, and manufacturing organizations in supply chain systems with environmental challenges. This paper focuses on and identifies both primary strategic and operational elements that will aid managers in evaluating and making risky multi-criteria decisions on green capacity investment projects. We propose a cloud prospect value consensus process consisting of feedback and adjustment mechanisms that provide modification instructions to the corresponding decision makers for a decision matrix based on the cloud model and prospect theory, which considers psychological behavior, disagreements between decision makers, and the ambiguity of linguistic variable assessment across multi-criteria risks. The new model increases the efficiency and accuracy of decision making. To verify the feasibility and validity of the Cloud Prospect Value Consensus Degree based on the Feedback adjustment mechanism, its performance is compared with three state-of-the-art multi-criteria group decision-making methods.

Keywords:

project analysis, decision theory, green capacity investment project, risky multi-criteria, group decision making, prospect theory

How to Cite

Song, Y., Yao, S., Yu, D., & Shen, Y. (2017). Risky multi-criteria group decision making on green capacity investment projects based on supply chain. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1331461

Share

Published in Issue
June 16, 2017
Abstract Views
866

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2017-06-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Song, Y., Yao, S., Yu, D., & Shen, Y. (2017). Risky multi-criteria group decision making on green capacity investment projects based on supply chain. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1331461

Share