A comparison of transformation models between geodetic reference frames: case study in Illizi region (Algeria)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2025.21550

Abstract

The Illizi region is an important petroleum zone in Algeria, where various seismic surveys have been conducted. The merging of adjacent surveys is not possible due to incompatible data linked to the geodetic networks. In this study, the transformation of coordinates, from the global system (WGS84) to the local system based on the Clarke 1880 A spheroid, is carried out based on a set of 57 control points well distributed over the study area with coordinates determined in both the global and local systems. Five approaches were used to determine the transformation parameters between the two systems, namely: Geocentric Translation Model, Bursa-Wolf Transformation, Molodensky-Badekas Transformation, Abridged Molodensky transformation and Multiple Regression Equations (MRE). From statistics on the determined parameters and considering its advantage of reversibility, the Bursa-Wolf Transformation Model is the most suitable model to be used to transform coordinates between the two systems in the study area. Small amount of residuals in transformed coordinates using this model indicates acceptable Bursa-Wolf parameter estimation. An improvement in the results was observed after removing of the outliers control points detected using a statistical test. For the validation of the estimated parameters, external control points were used. The results show acceptable RMS in transformed coordinates of these points.

Keywords:

geodetic reference system, residuals, coordinates transformation, transformation parameters, global system, local system

How to Cite

Haddad, M., & Gahlouz, M. (2025). A comparison of transformation models between geodetic reference frames: case study in Illizi region (Algeria). Geodesy and Cartography, 51(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2025.21550

Share

Published in Issue
December 18, 2025
Abstract Views
31

References

Appelbaum, L. T. (1982). Geodetic datum transformation by multiple regression equations. In Proceedings of the Third International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Doppler Positioning (pp. 207–223). Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Badekas, J. (1969). Investigations related to the establishment of a world geodetic system (Report No. 124). Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Bursa, M. (1962). The theory for the determination of the non-parallelism of the minor axis of the reference ellipsoid and the inertial polar axis of the earth, and the planes of the initial astronomic and geodetic meridians from observations of artificial earth satellites. Studia Geophysica et Geodetica, 6, 209–214.

Defense Mapping Agency. (1990). Datums, ellipsoids, grids and grid reference systems (DMA technical manual No. 8358.1). Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Defense Mapping Agency. (1987, December 1). Supplement to Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984: Part 1. Methods, techniques, and data used in WGS84 development (Technical report, DMA TR 8350.2-A, 1st ed.).

Mitsakaki, C. (2004, May). Coordinate transformations [Paper presentation]. FIG Working Week 2004, Athens, Greece. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/athens/papers/ts07/ts07_2_mitsakaki.pdf

Molodensky, M. S., Eremeev, V. F., & Yurkina, M. I. (1962). Methods for the study of the external gravitational field and figure of the earth. Israeli Programme for the Translation of Scientific Publications.

National Imagery and Mapping Agency. (2004). World Geodetic System 1984: Its definition and relationships with local geodetic systems (Technical report No. 8350.2, 3rd ed.). Washington.

Paláncz, B., Zaletnyik, P., Awange, J. L., & Beck, B. (2010). Extension of the ABC-Procrustes algorithm for 3D aff ine coordinate transformation. Earth, Planets and Space, 62, 857–862. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2010.10.004

Ruffhead, A. C. (2022). Partitions of normalised multiple regression equations for datum transformations. Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences, 28(1), Article e2022007. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702022000100007

Wolf, H. (1963). Geometric connection and re-orientation of three-dimensional triangulation nets. Bulletin Geodesique, 68, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02526150

Ziggah, Y. Y., Ayer, J., Laari, P. B., & Frimpong, E. (2017). Coordinate transformation using Featherstone and Vaníček proposed approach – a case study of Ghana geodetic reference network. Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 4(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.4.1.19-26

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Haddad, M., & Gahlouz, M. (2025). A comparison of transformation models between geodetic reference frames: case study in Illizi region (Algeria). Geodesy and Cartography, 51(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2025.21550

Share