Evaluating the performance of Moroccan social incubators: an SFA analysis of youth platforms under the national initiative for human development

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2025.22086

Abstract

Purpose – This study focuses on the evaluation of youth platforms as an important  social incubator of the National Initiative for Human Development (NIHD) in Morocco, particularly to promote social entrepreneurship and support very small enterprises (VSE). Numerous social incubators have been created to support social entrepreneurship and foster innovative and effective socio-economic relations. However, their impact remains limited, raising  questions about their performance.

Research methodology – Based on a sample of 40 NIHD youth platforms, the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) method was applied to measure their technical efficiency (TE), and then the  determinants of the TE obtained were analysed by a regression using the Tobit model. 

Findings – The results indicate that management costs (MC), the number of accompanied  project holders (APH) and income improvement actions in social and solidarity economy (II- ASSE) have a significant impact on the creation and development of VSE or cooperatives. In  addition, the experience of the platform manager has a positive influence on TE, while age  has no significant effect.

Research limitations – The conclusions of the study may not be entirely applicable to the  current situation of NIHD youth platforms in Morocco, because they are based on data available at a time conditioned by an exceptional context (e.g., post-covid; government austerity  policy, etc.). 

Practical implications – This study provides public policymakers and platform managers with  actionable insights into optimizing resource use and improving platform operations. Policy-makers can use the findings to allocate funding more effectively, prioritize support services  like income improvement actions, and identify platforms that serve as benchmarks for best  practices. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of experienced platform managers,  guiding recruitment and training policies to improve platform outcomes.

Originality/Value – The study paves the way for future research aimed at exploring in more  depth the underlying mechanisms of the efficiency of NIHD youth platforms.

Keywords:

development, incubator, SFA, social entrepreneurship, technical efficiency

How to Cite

El Maaqili, Y., Tlemcani Mhandez, M., & Ouchen, A. (2025). Evaluating the performance of Moroccan social incubators: an SFA analysis of youth platforms under the national initiative for human development. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 23(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2025.22086

Share

Published in Issue
June 19, 2025
Abstract Views
63

References

Aaboen, L., Lindelof, P., & Lofsten, H. (2008). Incubator performance: An efficiency frontier analysis. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2(4), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2008.018585

Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5

Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-X

Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7961-2

Bucci, A., & Marks, J. (2022). Social entrepreneurs’ learning experience in South African incubators. Africa Journal of Management, 8(3), 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2022.2071573

Bukanov, H., Kolesnyk, A., Tashkinova, O., Kotlubai, V., & Koval, V. (2019). Social marketing in public administration of social service institutions. Gênero & Direito, 8(6), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n6.49320

Carriles-Alberdi, M., Lopez-Gutierrez, C., & Fernandez-Laviada, A. (2021). The influence of the ecosystem on the motivation of social entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020922

Castano, M. C. N., & Cabanda, E. C. (2007). Performance evaluation of the efficiency of Philippine private higher educational institutions: Application of frontier approaches. International Transactions in Operational Research, 14(5), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2007.00599.x

Charoenrat, T., & Harvie, C. (2013). Technical efficiency of Thai manufacturing SMEs: A stochastic frontier analysis. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 7(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v7i1.7

Chmelik, E., Musteen, M., & Ahsan, M. (2016). Measures of performance in the context of international social ventures: An exploratory study. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.997781

Coelli, T., Prasada Rao, D. S., O’Donnell, C., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b136381

Collavo, T. (2022). Foundations of social entrepreneurship: Theory, practical tools and skills (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003121824

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8

Demi̇rci̇oğlu, Ş. N., & Özgüner, Z. (2022). Evaluation of efficiency measurement of selected technoparks with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Ege Academic Review, 22(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.925772

Dimitri, M., Léopold, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, S. S. (Eds.). (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press.

Dionisio, M. (2019). The evolution of social entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2018-0042

Djimasra, N. (2009). Efficacité technique, productivité et compétitivité des principaux pays producteurs de coton [Technical efficiency, productivity and competitiveness of the main cotton-producing countries] [published doctoral dissertation, Orleans University, France]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00482828

El Maaqili, Y., & Ouchen, A. (2024a). A bibliometric study of social innovation and sustainable territorial development: Key research trends and emerging insights. In L. Alla, B. Alj, & B. Bentalha (Eds.), Utilizing technology to manage territories (pp. 37–70). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6854-1.ch002

El Maaqili, Y., & Ouchen, A. (2024b). Digital innovations for good: A bibliometric study of social entrepreneurship digitalization. In S. Motahhir & B. Bossoufi (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems: Vol. 11001. Digital technologies and applications (pp. 187–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68675-7_19

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

Fongue, N., Tamini, L. D., Larue, B., & West, G. E. (2014). Efficiences technique et environnementale en agriculture: Le cas du bassin de la rivière Chaudière au Québec [Technical and environmental efficiencies in agriculture: The case of the Chaudiere River basin in Quebec] (CREATE Working Paper No. 2014–10). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510513

Gayosa, E. S., & Cabanda, E. (2014). Frontier analysis of the Philippine manufacturing efficiency. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 6(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2014.059733

Ghali, M., Latruffe, L., & Daniel, K. (2016). Efficient use of energy resources on French farms: An analysis through technical efficiency. Energies, 9(8), Article 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9080601

Hewitt, L. M. M., & Van Rensburg, L. J. J. (2020). The role of business incubators in creating sustainable small and medium enterprises. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 12(1), Article a295. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v12i1.295

Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12171

Hoffmann, S., Jaeger, D., Lingenfelder, M., & Schoenherr, S. (2016). Analyzing the efficiency of a start-up cable yarding crew in Southern China under new forest management perspectives. Forests, 7(12), Article 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7090188

Huang, W., Xu, L., & Guo, Y. (2021). Analysis on technical efficiency and influencing factors of agricultural production in China – Based on the stochastic frontier analysis model. E3S Web of Conferences, 235, Article 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123502005

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6, 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5

Kauko, K. (2007). Managers and efficiency in banking (Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper No. 11/2007). Bank of Finland. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965677

Kodde, D. A., & Palm, F. C. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica, 54(5), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912331

Kostetska, K. O., Gordiichuk, Y. G., Movchaniuk, А. V., Vdovenko, N. M., Nahornyi, V. V., & Koval, V. V. (2021). Inclusive development of social entrepreneurship in nature management. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 30(3), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.15421/112146

Kumbhakar, S. C., Parmeter, C. F., & Zelenyuk, V. (2021). Stochastic frontier analysis: Foundations and advances I. In S. C. Ray, R. Chambers, & S. Kumbhakar (Eds.), Handbook of production economics (pp. 1–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3450-3_9-2

Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2021). Should low carbon energy technologies be envisaged in the context of sustainable energy systems? In G. L. Kyriakopoulos (Ed.), Low carbon energy technologies in sustainable energy systems (pp. 357–389). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822897-5.00015-8

Laborda Castillo, L., Guasch, J. L., & Sotelsek Salem, D. (2011). Entrepreneurship capital and technical efficiency: The role of new business/firms as a conduit of knowledge spillovers. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(4), Article 20124004. https://doi.org/10.2202/2157-5665.1023

Lamb, J. D., & Tee, K.-H. (2024). Using stochastic frontier analysis instead of data envelopment analysis in modelling investment performance. Annals of Operations Research, 332, 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05428-w

Lin, T. T., Lee, C.-C., & Chiu, T.-F. (2009). Application of DEA in analyzing a bank’s operating performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8883–8891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.018

Liu, H., Liu, H., & Geng, L. (2024). Analysis of industrial water use efficiency based on SFA – Tobit Panel Model in China. Sustainability, 16(19), Article 8708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198708

Maniriho, A., Musabanganji, E., & Lebailly, P. (2020). Analysis of economic efficiency of small-scale onion production in volcanic highlands in Rwanda. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(3), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-3.15

Matsvai, S., Mushunje, A., & Tatsvarei, S. (2022). Technical efficiency impact of microfinance on small scale resettled sugar cane farmers in Zimbabwe. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), Article 2017599. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2017599

Meeusen, W., & Van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757

Messeghem, K., Bakkali, C., Sammut, S., & Swalhi, A. (2018). Measuring nonprofit incubator performance: Toward an adapted balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(4), 658–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12317

Parwita, G. B. S., Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Hrinchenko, R., Bogdanova, N., & Tamošiūnienė, R. (2021). Organizational innovation capability: Integrating human resource management practice, knowledge management and individual creativity. Intelellectual Economics, 15(2), 22–45.

Petchenko, M., Telnova, H., Yakushev, O., & Kuzminova, O. (2024). The evolution of the theory of innovation ecosystems in the context of strategisation. Economics Ecology Socium, 8(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.2-7

Prokopenko, O., Chechel, A., Koldovskiy, A., & Kldiashvili, M. (2024). Innovative models of green entrepreneurship: Social impact on sustainable development of local economies. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 8(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.1-8

Průša, J. (2010). Productivity of Czech small and medium enterprises: Lagging behind their potential. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10, 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-010-0072-3

Qian, C., Zhu, X., Antonides, G., & Heerink, N. (2024). Personality traits and technical efficiency of Chinese rice farmers. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 779–814. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbae019

Ripoll-Zarraga, A. E., & Huderek-Glapska, S. (2021). Airports’ managerial human capital, ownership, and efficiency. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, Article 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102035

Roundy, P. T., & Lyons, T. S. (2022). Humility in social entrepreneurs and its implications for social impact entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, Article e00296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00296

Saidi, H., & Madhat, F. Z. (2024). Mapping the evolution of open innovation and digital transformation: A bibliometric analysis. In S. Motahhir & B. Bossoufi (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems: Vol. 1101. Digital technologies and applications (pp. 178–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68675-7_18

Silva, P. M., Moutinho, V. F., & Gaspar, P. M. (2024). Do labour productivity, capital productivity and education influence the technical efficiency of entrepreneurial outcomes? Evidence from Europe. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-024-00366-5

Štreimikienė, D., Mikalauskienė, A., Sturienė, U., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2021). The impact of social media on sales promotion in entertainment companies. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 24(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-2-012

Štreimikienė, D., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2023). Energy poverty and low carbon energy transition. Energies, 16(2), Article 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020610

Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285

Tipi, T., Dari, İ., & Vural, H. (2021). Technical efficiency of cotton farms and its determinants: Application of stochastic frontier analysis. Custos e Agronegocio, 17(2), 268–286.

Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382

Trabskaia, I., Gorgadze, A., Raudsaar, M., & Myyryläinen, H. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 13(3), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030075

Zapata-Guerrero, F. T., Ayup, J., Mayer-Granados, E. L., & Charles-Coll, J. (2020). Incubator efficiency vs survival of start-ups. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2019-0063

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

El Maaqili, Y., Tlemcani Mhandez, M., & Ouchen, A. (2025). Evaluating the performance of Moroccan social incubators: an SFA analysis of youth platforms under the national initiative for human development. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 23(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2025.22086

Share