Reducing unsafe behaviors in aviation maintenance: a study on formation mechanism and intervention strategies based on system simulation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2026.26000Abstract
Aviation safety problems lead to casualties and property damage, with unsafe behaviors of aviation maintenance personnel being a critical factor. This study firstly constructed a four-stage cognitive model (information acquisition, information processing, response selection, and action execution) to build a cognitive model about unsafe behaviors. In the first two stages, an information processing model was established to analyze personnel cognitions, while in the latter two stages, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was used to explain operational decision-making. Subsequently, an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) framework was developed to simulate multiagent interactions in aviation maintenance environments. By synthesizing safety responsibilities across managerial hierarchies, interaction rules between operators and managers were formalized, which was rigorously described by ODD (Overview, Design concepts, Details) protocol to ensure clarity and generalizability. Finally, the ABM was visualized on NetLogo platform and validated through a case study of a maintenance operation. Then simulation analysis of different intervention strategies was conducted to quantify the efficacy in reducing non-compliant operations, providing actionable recommendations. This study innovatively integrated perspectives from social psychology and cognitive psychology to investigate the cognitive model of unsafe behaviors among aviation maintenance personnel. The findings provided a foundational reference for developing safety management strategies in aviation maintenance.
Keywords:
aviation maintenance, unsafe behavior, cognitive model, Agent-based model, simulation analysis, safetyHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Akdeniz, G., Yilmaz, H. E., & Geza, H. (2025). Cognitive and emotional impacts of face pareidolia application among pilot students. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 96(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6428.2025
Aktas, E., & Kagnicioglu, C. H. (2023). Factors affecting safety behaviors of aircraft maintenance technicians: A study on civil aviation industry in Turkey. Safety Science, 164, Article 106146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106146
Alavosius, M. P., Houmanfar, R. A., Anbro, S. J., Burleigh, K., & Hebein, C. (2017). Leadership and crew resource management in high-reliability organizations: A competency framework for measuring behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 142–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1325825
Anderson, E. S., Griffiths, T. R. L., Forey, T., Wobi, F., Norman, R. I., & Martin, G. (2021). Developing healthcare team observations for patient safety (HTOPS): Senior medical students capture everyday clinical moments. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 7, Article 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00891-3
Anebagilu, P. K., Dietrich, J., Prado-Stuardo, L., Morales, B., Winter, E., & Arumi, J. L. (2021). Application of the theory of planned behavior with agent-based modeling for sustainable management of vegetative filter strips. Journal of Environmental Management, 284, Article 112014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112014
Barde, S., & Hoog, S. V. D. (2017). An empirical validation protocol for large-scale agent-based models (Bielefeld Working Papers in Economics and Management No. 04). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2992473
Bruch, E., & Atwell, J. (2015). Agent-based models in empirical social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(2), 186–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113506405
Cabuya-Padilla, D., Diaz-Lopez, D., Martinez-Paez, J., Hernandez, L., & Castaneda-Marroquin, C. (2025). SERDUX-MARCIM: Maritime cyberattack simulation using dynamic modeling, compartmental models in epidemiology and agent-based modeling. International Journal of Information Security, 24, Article 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-025-00985-6
Campolettano, E. T., Bland, M. L., Gellner, R. A., Sproule, D. W., Rowson, B., Tyson, A. M., Duma, S. M., & Rowson, S. (2017). Ranges of injury risk associated with impact from unmanned aircraft systems. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45, 2733–2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-017-1921-6
Chen, F., Fan, D., & Liu, K. (2016). Study on strategies for intervention in unsafe behavior of aviation maintenance personnel. China Safety Science Journal, 26, 18–22. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2016.07.004
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2020). Research progress on interlaminar failure behavior of fiber metal laminates. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2020, Article 3097839. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3097839
Chiacchio, F., Pennisi, M., Russo, G., Motta, S., & Pappalardo, F. (2014). Agent-based modeling of the immune system: NetLogo, a promising framework. Biomed Research International, 2014, Article 907171. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/907171
Choi, B., & Lee, S. (2018). An empirically based agent-based model of the sociocognitive process of construction workers’ safety behavior. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001421
Deng, S., Peng, R., & Pan, Y. (2022a). A cognitive failure model of construction workers’ unsafe behavior. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, Article 2576600. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2576600
Deng, S. W., Zhu, H. L., Peng, R., & Pan, Y. G. (2022b). Development and validation of a cognitive model-based novel questionnaire for measuring potential unsafe behaviors of construction workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 28(4), 2566–2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.2010408
Fang, D., Zhao, C., & Zhang, M. (2016). A cognitive model of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001118
Fogarty, G. J., & Shaw, A. (2010). Safety climate and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Towards the prediction of unsafe behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5), 1455–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008
Fu, G., Wu, Q., Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Discussion and justification of the assessment methods of the unsafe acts and the unsafe conditions. Journal of Safety and Environment, 17, 994–998. https://doi.org/10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.03.035
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Calabrese, J. M., Cortes-Avizanda, A., Ferrer, J., Franz, M., Groeneveld, J., Hartig, F., Jakoby, O., Jovani, R., Kramer-Schadt, S., Munkemuller, T., Piou, C., Premo, L. S., Puetz, S., Quintaine, T., Rademacher, C., Rueger, N., Schmolke, A., Thiele, J. C., Touza, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2025). Using the ODD protocol and NetLogo to replicate agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 501, Article 110967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110967
Guo, S., Tang, B., Liang, K., Zhou, X., & Li, J. (2021). Comparative analysis of the patterns of unsafe behaviors in accidents between building construction and urban railway construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002013
Han, Y. W., Shen, J., Zhu, X. W., & Bao, X. Y. (2025). Two-stage propagation analysis of safety risks in complex underground engineering: An integrated modeling framework. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 261, Article 111081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111081
Hobbs, A., & Williamson, A. (2002). Unsafe acts and unsafe outcomes in aircraft maintenance. Ergonomics, 45(12), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130210148528
Hong, Y., Kim, M. J., & Sohn, Y. W. (2023). The Relationship between Job Insecurity and Safety Behavior: The Buffering Role of Leadership Ethics. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813910
Huang, L., Wu, C., Wang, B., Ouyang, Q., & Lin, H. (2019). An unsafe behaviour formation mechanism based on risk perception. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 29(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20762
Huang, W. D., & Cui, Y. (2019). Effect of individual cognitive behavior model on public opinion communication mechanism based on social ecosystem. Ekoloji, 28, 4723–4730.
Innocenti, E., Delhom, M., Idda, C., Gonsolin, P.-R., & Urbani, D. (2021). Agent-based modelling of the spread of COVID-19 in Corsica. In IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660184
Jiang, S. Q., Chen, W. J., Kang, Y. T., Liu, J. H., & Kuang, W. L. (2021). Identifying cognitive mechanism underlying situation awareness of pilots’ unsafe behaviors using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), Article 3052. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063052
Jin, P. J., Guo, S. H., & Li, C. Q. (2025). Center-of-gravity-aware graph convolution for unsafe behavior recognition of construction workers. Sensors, 25(17), Article 5493. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175493
Li, B., Tang, S. F., & Li, W. Y. (2025). Real-time recognition of miner unsafe behaviors via skeleton-based spatiotemporal modeling with Mamba. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 22, Article 188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-025-01764-1
Li, L., Zhao, Y., Cao, Y., Chen, Y., & Qi, J. (2023). Influencing factors and functions of unsafe behavior propagation of civil aviation maintenance personnel. Journal of Safety and Environment, 23, 4435–4441. https://doi.org/10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2022.2167
Li, M., Yuan, C., Li, K., Gao, M., Zhang, Y., & Lv, H. (2024a). Knowledge management model for urban flood emergency response based on multimodal knowledge graphs. Water, 16(12), Article 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121676
Li, X. (2020). Influence of different parameter on the spread of COVID-19 based on NetLogo. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE) (pp. 315–318), Beijing, China. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICE51518.2020.00067
Li, X., Qiu, Z., Liu, Q., Zhang, X., and Zhang, Y. (2024b). Research on the propagation mechanism of Miners’ unsafe behavior based on subject heterogeneity. Operations Research and Management Science, 33, 220–226.
Liang, Q., Feng, M. L., & Leung, M. Y. (2025). Exploring pathways to unsafe behaviors under stress: Identifying safety antecedent factors and configuration analyses. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2025-0016
Maneechaeye, P., & Potipiroon, W. (2022). The impact of fleet-level and organization-level safety climates on safety behavior among Thai civilian pilots: The role of safety motivation. Safety Science, 147, Article 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105614
Mezentseva, A., Gracia, F. J., Silla, I., & Martínez-Córcoles, M. (2023). The role of empowering leadership, safety culture and safety climate in the prediction of mindful organizing in an air traffic management company. Safety Science, 168, Article 106321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106321
Ni, G., Yang, L., An, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Contagion mechanism of unsafe behavior information in groups of construction workers. China Safety Science Journal (CSSJ), 34, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.01.2491
Ni, G. D., Zhang, Q., Fang, Y. Q., Zhang, Z. Y., Qiao, Y. N., Wang, W. S., & Deng, Y. L. (2023). How resilient safety culture correct unsafe behavior of new generation of construction workers: the mediating effects of job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 30, 4821–4845. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2022-0325
Peker, M., Dogru, O. C., & Mese, G. (2022). Role of supervisor behavioral integrity for safety in the relationship between top-management safety climate, safety motivation, and safety performance. Safety and Health at Work, 13(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.006
Racca, A. R., Sulis, E., & Capecchi, S. (2022). Behavioral web tracking in e-learning: An educational process mining application. In 26th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV) (pp. 269–274), Vienna, Austria. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV56949.2022.00053
Shin, H., & Bithell, M. (2022). Exposure to non-exhaust emission in Central Seoul using an agent-based framework. In M. Czupryna & B. Kaminski, Advances in social simulation (pp. 343–354). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_26
Sun, N. H., & Tong, R. P. (2025). A century of inquiry in industrial safety: Intellectual genealogy and future prospects in unsafe behavior research. Safety Science, 191, Article 106971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106971
Tyagi, A., Tripathi, R., & Bouarfa, S. (2023). Safety management system and hazards in the aircraft maintenance industry: A systematic literature review. Aviation, 27(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2023.19851
Wachter, J. K., & Yorio, P. L. (2014). A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029
Wang, Y., & Hou, X. (2015). Study on influence to unsafe behavior of aircraft maintenance personnel by maintenance resource management based on SEM. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 11, 110–115.
Wu, T. C., Lin, C. H., & Shiau, S. Y. (2010). Predicting safety culture: The roles of employer, operations manager and safety professional. Journal of Safety Research, 41(5), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.06.006
Wu, X., Li, X., Chen, J., Gao, J., & Luo, X. (2024). Driving mechanism of attentional bias toward safety of construction workers: Case study in China. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 33(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2024-0370
Xiao, Q., Luo, F., Li, Y., & Pan, D. (2023). Risk prediction and early warning of pilots’ unsafe behaviors using association rule mining and system dynamics. Journal of Air Transport Management, 110, Article 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102422
Yang, C., Wei, W., Bai, H., Liu, P., Ji, M., & You, X. (2025). The relationship between sense of calling and safety behaviors of aircraft maintenance technicians: A moderated mediation model. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 23, 714–720.
Yang, C. C., Liu, P., Xu, S., Xie, X. D., Li, X. H., Bai, H., Ji, M., & You, X. Q. (2024). Exploring positive psychological factor on safety behavior of Chinese aircraft maintenance technicians: The interplay of workplace well-being, work engagement, and leadership. Safety Science, 175, Article 106523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106523
Yi, T., Dong, Y., & Li, J. Z. (2025). Leadership in the darkness: Unveiling the impact of exploitative tactics on Miners’ unsafe behaviors. Safety Science, 188, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106873
Yin, X., Xu, X., & Chen, X. (2020). Risk mechanisms of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation. Natural Hazards, 103, 1009–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04023-7
Zhang, Z. T., Guo, H. L., Gao, P. Z., Wang, Y., & Fang, Y. H. (2023). Impact of owners’ safety management behavior on construction workers’ unsafe behavior. Safety Science, 158, Article 105944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105944
Zhang, Z. T., Guo, H. L., Li, H., & Fang, Y. H. (2025). Agent-based simulation approach to analyzing the impact of construction safety management behaviors on workers’ safety behaviors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15977
Zhao, C., Li, H., Zhang, W., Dai, J., & Dong, L. (2024). Risk identification and safety assessment of human-computer interaction in integrated avionics based on STAMP. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 35(3), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2024.000031
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.