Blade element – momentum aerodynamic model of a helicopter rotor operating at low-Reynolds numbers in ground effect

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.23587

Abstract

The general objective of this paper is to present the initial results obtained as an outcome of applying a coupled Experimentally Derived – Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) model for evaluating the airflow-defining parameters of a hovering helicopter rotor close to obstacles and making performance predictions. Several empirical models are described, and proper comparison with the experimentally obtained data is conducted. In detail, the characterization of the rotor inflow ratio (λ), when operating at fixed rotational frequency (n), at different relative distances to the ground (H/R), varying the pitching angle (θ) is discussed. The dependencies show an increase in the rotor inflow ratio parameter (λ), when increasing the collective pitch angle (θ) in hovering regime at fixed constant relative distance to the ground surface (H/R). On the contrary, the inflow ratio (λ) is experiencing a decline once the helicopter rotor operates closer to the ground surface. Moreover, the inflow ratio characterization (λ) along the blade span can be applied to the total generated thrust (T). As a result, the corresponding thrust coefficients (CT) are calculated and graphically represented. The overall characterization of the thrust coefficients (CT) will allow the definition of the ground effect zone.

Keywords:

Blade Element – Momentum Theory, helicopter rotor, ground effect, rotorcraft aerodynamic characteristics, helicopter rotor flow characterization, helicopter rotor in hover

How to Cite

Georgiev, G. (2025). Blade element – momentum aerodynamic model of a helicopter rotor operating at low-Reynolds numbers in ground effect. Aviation, 29(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.23587

Share

Published in Issue
May 21, 2025
Abstract Views
174

References

Bohorquez, F., Samuel, P., Sirohi, J., Pines, D., & Rudd, L. (2023). Design, analysis and hover performance of a rotary wing micro air vehicle. Journal of The American Helicopter Society, 48(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.48.80> https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.48.80

Brown, R., & Whitehouse, G. (2004). Modelling rotor wakes in ground effect. Journal of American Helicopter Society, 49(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.49.238> https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.49.238

Conyers, S., Rutherford, M., & Valavanis, K. (2018). An empirical evaluation of ground effect for small-scale rotorcraft. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453469> https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453469

Eberhart, G., & Wilhelm, J. (2018). Development of a ground effect bemt analysis method for multirotor sUAS. In AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech. Aerospace Research Central. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0747> https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0747

Fradenburgh, E. (1960). The helicopter and the ground effect machine. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 5(4), 24–33(10). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.5.4.24> https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.5.4.24

Georgiev, G., Panayotov, F., Serbezov, V., & Todorov, M. (2024). Experimental study of static characteristics of a helicopter rotor in ground effect. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2980(1), Article 050002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186410> https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186410

Georgiev, G., Serbezov, V., & Todorov, M. (2022). Experimental study of multicopter propeller performance near the ground at different inclination angles. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2557, Article 020002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106920> https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106920

Gilad, M., Chopra, I., & Rand, O. (2011). Performance evaluation of a flexible rotor in extreme ground effect. In 37th European Rotorcraft Forum (pp. 1–10). Italy, Milan.

Graber, A., Rosen, A., & Seginer, A. (1991). An investigation of a hovering rotor in ground effect. The Aeronautical Journal, 95(945), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000023812> https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000023812

Griffiths, D., Ananthan, S., & Leishman, G. (2005). Predictions of rotor performance in ground effect using a free-vortex wake model. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 50(4), 302–314(13). https://doi.org/10.4050/1.3092867> https://doi.org/10.4050/1.3092867

Hanker, E., & Smith, R. (1985). Parameters affecting helicopter interactional aerodynamics in ground effect. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 30(1), 52–61(10). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.30.52> https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.30.52

Johnson, W. (2019). NASA design and analysis of rotorcraft (Release 1.14). NASA. Ames Research Center.

Johnson, W. (2013). Rotorcraft aeromechanics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655> https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655

Khromov, V., & Rand, O. (2008). Ground effect modelling for rotary – wing simulation. In 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (pp. 1–10). Anchorage.

Knight, M., & Hefner, R. (1941). Analysis of ground effect on lifting airscrew (National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics Technical Notes №835). UNT Digital Library.

Koning, W., Johnson, W., & Grip, H. F. (2019). Improved Mars helicopter aerodynamic rotor model for comprehensive analyses. AIAA Journal, 57(9). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058045> https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058045

Kutz, B., Großmann, T., Keßler, M., & Krämer, E. (2013). Experimental and numerical examination of a helicopter hovering in ground effect. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 4, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-013-0084-x> https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-013-0084-x

Leishman, G. (2006). Principles of helicopter aerodynamics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Lighthill, J. (1979). A simple fluid-flow model of ground effect on hovering. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 93(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112079002032> https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112079002032

Madsen, H., Mikkelsen, R., Øye, S., Bak, S., & Johansen, J. (2007). A detailed investigation of the blade element momentum (BEM) model based on analytical and numerical results and proposal for modifications of the BEM model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 75(1), Article 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012016> https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012016

Nagaraj, V., Chopra, I., & Pines, D. (2021). Gamera: A human powered helicopter – in pursuit of an aviation milestone. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.106217> https://doi.org/10.2514/4.106217

Nathan, N., & Green, R. (2011). The flow around a model helicopter main rotor in ground effect. Experiments in Fluids, 52, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1212-1> https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1212-1

Pulla, D., & Conlisk, A. (2007). A lifting surface study of helicopter aerodynamics in ground effect. In 45th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit (pp. 1–15). ARC. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-1279> https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-1279

Purvis, R. (2002). Rotor blades and ground effect [Doctoral dissertation, University College London]. UCL Discovery.

Rotaru, C., & Todorov, M. (2017). Helicopter flight physics. Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71516> https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71516

Todorov, M., Dobrev, I., Massouh, F., & Velkova C. (2012). An investigation of the motion of a rotor with flapping and LEAD/LAG hinges in hover. BulTrans – 2012 Proceedings. ResearchGate.

Zhao, J., & He, C. (2015). Physics-based modeling of viscous ground effect for rotorcraft applications. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 60(3), 1–13(13). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.60.032006> https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.60.032006

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Georgiev, G. (2025). Blade element – momentum aerodynamic model of a helicopter rotor operating at low-Reynolds numbers in ground effect. Aviation, 29(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.23587

Share