Comparison of platforms used in simulated session as a learning tool for instrument procedures training

    Ondrej Mach   Affiliation
    ; Jiri Ulvr   Affiliation


Authors aim to analyze the requirements for the use of simulation technologies for the Air Traffic Pilot License Theory and, based on the selected, measured, and interpreted parameters, to compare the platforms used by the Czech Air Force. At the University of Defence, the simulation center is used as a support instrument. The objective of this paper is to determine the most appropriate flying platform for student-pilots when employing basic radionavigation theory. To verify the analysis, simulated student flights were carried out. The first group of approaches was performed on the simulated platform of the Zlin Z142 aircraft, and the second group on the L39 Albatros aircraft. Individual flights were statistically evaluated and compared. The parameters for comparison were the deviation of the flight altitude compared to the recommended approach altitude and the deviation of the heading compared to the final approach course. Statistical evaluation of the performed simulated flights was made by F-test and verified confirmed that to teach the theoretical subject of Radionavigation, a slower-flying Zlin Z-142 is more suitable. According to the results, the Z142 platform gives the student more time to observe a pilotage error and correct it before starting the final approach phase.

Keyword : simulation, platform selection, pilot training, instrument approach, radionavigation, F-test

How to Cite
Mach, O., & Ulvr, J. (2023). Comparison of platforms used in simulated session as a learning tool for instrument procedures training. Aviation, 27(3), 141–151.
Published in Issue
Oct 13, 2023
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Aeronautical Information Management. (2020). L 8168/I Předpis Provoz letadel – letadlové postupy.

Avialogs: Aviation Library. (1989). Flight Manual of the Z-142 Aircraft.

Avialogs: Aviation Library. (1991). Flight Manual L-39C – AAL. Albatros.

Boril, J., Leuchter, J., Smrz, V., & Blasch, E. (2015). Aviation simulation training in the Czech air force. In Paper presented at the AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference – Proceedings, 9A21-9A213. IEEE Xplore.

Boril, J., Smrz, V., & Mach, O. (2017). Development of experimental methods for testing of human performance in the framework of future military pilot’s preparation. In The Paper presented at the ICMT 2017 – 6th International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT) (pp. 548–552). IEEE Xplore.

Eur-Lex. (2011). Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance.

European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2021). EASA use and benefits of simulators.

F-AIR. (2020). Procedures and manoeuvres for IFR flight (aircraft).

Federal Aviation Administration. (2021). Aeronautical Information Manual – AIM.

Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Kalvoda, J., Bauer, M., & Račková, P. (2022). Development of a methodology for assessing workload within the air traffic control environment in the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 14(13), 7858.

Imrich, T. (2007). All-Weather OPS. Aero Safety World, (September), 22–27.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2015). Doc 9625: Manual of criteria for the qualification of flight simulation training devices (4th ed.). ICAO.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2021). EUR frequency management manual.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2018). Annex 10. Aeronautical telecommunications. Vol. I: Radio navigation aids.

Jeppesen. (2022). Boeing digital solutions, Inc. Airway manual. Jeppesen.

King, A. P., & Eckersley, R. J. (2019). Chapter 5 – Inferential statistics II: Parametric hypothesis testing. In Paper presented at the Statistics for Biomedical Engineers and Scientists (pp. 91–117). Academic Press.

Korecki, Z., & Adámková, B. (2018). Implement policies and processes to increase the level of security of the multi-tier logistics chain. In New Trends in Aviation Development 2018 (pp. 76–81). IEEE.

Korecki, Z., Hoika, T., Ulvr, J., Janošek, M., & Grega, M. (2022). Simulation of the attack helicopter Mil Mi-24 conducting anti-surface air operations in support of a battalion task group. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2022(3).

Kozuba, J., Kustra, M., & Tomaszewska, J. (2016). Analysis of the aircraft accidents occurred in units of the Polish air force academy in the years 1970–1994. In Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Problemy Transportu i Logistyki (nr. 1/2016 (33), pp. 35–43). ResearchGate.

Mori, R., & Fujita, M. (2020). Accurate estimation of ground obstacle collision probability during ILS approach. IEEE Access, 8, 66662–66671.

SKYbrary Aviation Safety. (2021). Rate of turn.

Smrz, V., Boril, J., Leuchter, J., & Blasch, E. (2017). Experience with objective measuring of the coriolis illusion influence on the pilot’s spatial orientation. In The Paper presented at the AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference – Proceedings. IEEE Xplore.

Univerzity of Defence News Portal. (2019). Perspektivy využití simulační a trenažérové techniky v odborné přípravě studentů Univerzity obrany.

Żak, J., Gołda, P., Cur, K., & Zawisza, T. (2021). Assessment of airside aerodrome infrastructure by SAW method with weights from Shannon’s interval entropy. Archives of Transport, 60(4), 171–185.

Zákony pro lidi. (2021). Act no. 49/1997 Sb., zákon o civilním letectví.