Verification of an entropy dissipative QGD-scheme for the 1D gas dynamics equations

    Alexander Zlotnik Info
    Timofey Lomonosov Info

Abstract

An entropy dissipative spatial discretization has recently been constructed for the multidimensional gas dynamics equations based on their preliminary parabolic quasi-gasdynamic (QGD) regularization. In this paper, an explicit finite-difference scheme with such a discretization is verified on several versions of the 1D Riemann problem, both well-known in the literature and new. The scheme is compared with the previously constructed QGD-schemes and its merits are noticed. Practical convergence rates in the mesh L1-norm are computed. We also analyze the practical relevance in the nonlinear statement as the Mach number grows of recently derived necessary conditions for L2-dissipativity of the Cauchy problem for a linearized QGD-scheme.

Keywords:

1D gas dynamics equations, entropy dissipative spatial discretization, explicit finite-difference scheme, verification on the Riemann problem, practical stability analysis

How to Cite

Zlotnik, A., & Lomonosov, T. (2019). Verification of an entropy dissipative QGD-scheme for the 1D gas dynamics equations. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 24(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.3846/mma.2019.013

Share

Published in Issue
February 5, 2019
Abstract Views
854

References

R. Abgrall and C.-W. Shu(Eds.). Handbook of numerical methods for hyperbolic problems: basic and fundamental issues. North Holland, Amsterdam, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-8659(16)x0002-6

B.N. Chetverushkin. Kinetic schemes and quasi-gas dynamic system of equations.CIMNE, Barcelona, 2008.

T.G. Elizarova. Quasi-gas dynamic equations. Springer, Dordrecht, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00292-2

T.G. Elizarova and E.V. Shil’nikov. Capabilities of a quasi-gasdynamic algorithm as applied to inviscid gas flow simulation. Comput. Math. Math. Phys.,49(3):532–548, 2009.https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542509030142

T.G. Elizarova and I.A. Shirokov. Regularized equations and examples of their using in modeling gas-dynamic flows. MAKS Press, Moscow, 2017. (in Russian)

U.S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra and E. Tadmor. Arbitrarily high-order accurate entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory schemes for systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50:544–573, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1137/110836961

V.A. Gavrilin and A.A Zlotnik. On spatial discretization of the one-dimensional quasi-gasdynamic system of equations with general equations of state and entropy balance. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 55(2):264–281, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542515020098

S.K. Godunov and I.M. Kulikov. Computation of discontinuous solutions of fluid dynamics equations with entropy nondecrease guarantee. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 54(6):1012–1024, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542514060086

M.V. Kraposhin, E.V. Smirnova, T.G. Elizarova and M.A. Istomina. Development of a new OpenFOAM solver using regularized gas dynamic equations. Comput. Fluids, 166:163–175, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.02.010

A.G. Kulikovskii, N.V. Pogorelov and A.Yu. Semenov. Mathematical aspects of numerical solution of hyperbolic systems. Chapman&Hall/CRC, London, 2001.

R.J. LeVeque. Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511791253.005

R. Liska and B. Wendroff. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25(3):995–1017, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55711-878

G.P. Prokopov. Necessity of entropy control in gasdynamic computations. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 47(9):1528–1537, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542507090138

M. Svärd and H.Özcan. Entropy stable schemes for the Euler equations with far-field and wall boundary conditions. J. Sci. Comput., 58(1):61–89, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9727-7

E. Tadmor. Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems. Acta Numer., 12:451–512, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511550157.007

E.F. Toro. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics, 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03915-1

A.R. Winters and G.J. Gassner. Affordable, entropy conserving and entropy stable flux functions for the ideal MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys., 304:72–108, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.09.055

A.A. Zlotnik. Quasi-gasdynamic system of equations with general equations of state. Dokl. Math., 81(2):312–316, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064562410020419

A.A. Zlotnik. Spatial discretization of the one-dimensional quasi-gasdynamic system of equations and the entropy balance equation. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 52(7):1060–1071, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542512070111

A.A. Zlotnik. Entropy-conservative spatial discretization of the multidimensional quasi-gasdynamic system of equations. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 57(4):706–725, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542517020166

A.A. Zlotnik and B.N. Chetverushkin. Parabolicity of the quasi-gasdynamic system of equations, its hyperbolic second-order modification, and the stability of small perturbations for them. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 48(3):420–446, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542508030081

A.A. Zlotnik and T.A. Lomonosov. On conditions for L2-dissipativity of linearized explicit QGD–finite-difference schemes for the equations of one-dimensional gas dynamics. Dokl. Math., 98(2):458–463, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562418060200

A.A. Zlotnik and T.A. Lomonosov. Conditions for L2-dissipativity of linearized explicit finite-difference schemes with regularization for the equations of 1D barotropic gas dynamics. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 59, 2019. (accepted).

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2019-02-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zlotnik, A., & Lomonosov, T. (2019). Verification of an entropy dissipative QGD-scheme for the 1D gas dynamics equations. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 24(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.3846/mma.2019.013

Share