Numerical algorithms to solve inverse problems for parabolic equations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/mma.2026.25585Abstract
This paper presents and analyzes robust numerical algorithms for solving inverse problems for parabolic equations, specifically focusing on the determination of an unknown time-dependent source function from an integral flux condition. The study is motivated by mathematical models based on Navier-Stokes equations, particularly those exhibiting Poiseuille-type solutions. We employ a variational approach, formulating the inverse problem as the minimization of a Tikhonov regularization cost functional. Discrete approximation schemes are rigorously derived using finite volume methods in space and both backward Euler and Crank-Nicolson schemes in time. A key contribution of this work is the strict justification of the gradient formula for the cost functional by deriving the adjoint problem directly from the fully discrete scheme, rather than discretizing the continuous adjoint problem. This methodology is extended to problems involving fractional powers of elliptic operators and two-dimensional domains. Numerical experiments are conducted to compare the efficiency of Gradient Descent and Conjugate Gradient methods. The results demonstrate that the Conjugate Gradient method significantly outperforms standard gradient descent, maintaining high accuracy and convergence rates even with the inclusion of regularization terms and complex diffusion operators.
Keywords:
inverse problems, parabolic partial differential equations, Tikhonov regularization, adjoint problem, gradient-based optimizationHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
R. Čiegis. Numerical algorithms to solve one inverse problem for Navier-Stokes equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 30(4):771–791, 2025. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2025.30.42686
R. Čiegis and P.N. Vabishchevich. High order numerical schemes for solving fractional powers of elliptic operators. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 327(112627):112627, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112627
D. Di Lorenzo, V. Champaney, C. Ghnatios, E. Cueto and F. Chinesta. Physicsinformed and graph neural networks for enhanced inverse analysis. Engineering Computations, 42(7):2427–2455, 11 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-12-2023-0958
S.A. Faroughi, N.M. Pawar, C. Fernandes, M. Raissi, S. Das, N.K. Kalantari and S. Kourosh Mahjour. Physics-guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neural networks and operators in scientific computing: Fluid and solid mechanics. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 24(4):040802, 01 2024. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064449
R. Fletcher and C.M. Reeves. Function minimization by conjugate gradients. The Computer Journal, 7(2):149–154, 1964.
M. Frigo and S.G. Johnson. The design and implementation of FFTW3. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(2):216–231, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301
C.J. Gladwin. On optimal integration methods for Volterra integral equations of the first kind. Mathematics of Computation, 39:511–518, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1982-0669643-1
G.H. Golub, P.C. Hansen and D.P. Oleary. Tikhonov regularization and total least squares. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 21(1):185–194, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479897326432
M. Hanke. Conjugate Gradient Type Methods for Ill-Posed Problems. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1995.
D.N. Hao, P.X. Thanh, D. Lesnic and N. Ivanchov. Determination of a source in the heat equation from integral observations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 264:82–98, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.005
A. Hasanov and B. Pektas. Identification of an unknown time-dependent heat source term from overspecified Dirichlet boundary data by conjugate gradient method. Comput. Math. Appl., 65(1):42–57, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.10.009
W. Hundsdorfer and J. Verwer. Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations, volume 33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09017-6
F. Izsák and B.J. Szekeres. Models of space-fractional diffusion: A critical review. Applied Mathematics Letters, 71:38–43, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2017.03.006
K. Kaulakytė, N. Kozulinas and K. Pileckas. Time-periodic Poiseuille-type solution with minimally regular flow-rate. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 26(5):947–968, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2021.26.24502
P.K. Lamm. A Survey of Regularization Methods for First-Kind Volterra Equations, In: Colton, D., Engl, H.W., Louis, A.K., McLaughlin, J.R., Rundell, W. (eds) Surveys on Solution Methods for Inverse Problems. Springer, Vienna, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6296-5_4
K. Pileckas and R. Čiegis. Existence of nonstationary Poiseuille type solutions under minimal regularity assumptions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 71(192), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-020-01422-5
M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris and G.E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.