Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Info
    Jurgita Antuchevičiene Info

Abstract

The authors analyse the problem of derelict buildings’ redevelopment by means of multi criterion decision‐making techniques. The aim of the research is to rank derelict buildings’ redevelopment alternatives from the multiple sustainability approach. Moreover, handling of MCDM techniques is discussed. The MCDM techniques used are: technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and compromise ranking method (VIKOR). A Lithuanian case study is presented to illustrate similarities and differences of ranking results using these methods in particular situation. The comparisons of the results after multiple criteria analysis implementation are made in the paper and scientific recommendations for a sustainable redevelopment of derelict buildings in Lithuanian rural areas are suggested on a basis of calculations.

First Published Online: 18 Oct 2010

Keywords:

Derelict buildings, Buildings’, redevelopment, MCDM, TOPSIS, VIKOR

How to Cite

Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičiene, J. (2010). Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 8(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2004.9637512

Share

Published in Issue
October 18, 2010
Abstract Views
649

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2010-10-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičiene, J. (2010). Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 8(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2004.9637512

Share