Importance of stakeholders and key performance indicators in campus management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2026.25314Abstract
Campus managers need to balance the competing claims of different stakeholders of higher education institutions (HEIs). Previous studies in general management have indicated that the decision-making processes are highly related to stakeholders’ attributes (power, legitimacy and urgency). However, such studies have not yet been conducted in the field of campus management. Therefore, this paper aims to identify the importance of key stakeholders in campus development and relevant key performance indicators (KPIs) that are essential for decision- makers in determining and explaining how their efforts are progressing towards achieving various stakeholders’ goals. To explore the underlying importance of campus stakeholders, a theory on stakeholder salience and a questionnaire survey among Polish public HEIs were employed. In turn, to identify various KPIs, the content analysis of institutions’ strategies was conducted. Empirical research suggests that in Polish public HEIs, authorities and academic staff continue to be regarded as the most important stakeholders (at different stages of the building’s life cycle, respectively). This contrasts with the growing market-oriented approach seen in higher education globally. Moreover, the KPIs presented in HEIs’ strategies are predominantly result-focused and rarely user-centric (which have begun to be perceived as the most significant with respect to building performance).
Keywords:
campus management, stakeholders, buildings life cycle, key performance indicators (KPIs), user-centric KPIs, higher education institutions (HEIs)How to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan. (2020). Strategia Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu na lata 2020–2030 [Strategy of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań for 2020–2030]. https://amu.edu.pl/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/374416/Strategia_UAM_2020_2030.pdf
AGH University of Krakow. (2022). Strategia Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie [Strategy of the Stanisław Staszic AGH University in Krakow]. https://www.agh.edu.pl/home/ckim/dokumenty/inne/Strategia_AGH_30.11.2022.pdf
Alves, H., Mainardes, E., & Raposo, M. A. (2010). Relationship approach to higher education institution stakeholder management. Tertiary Education and Management, 16, 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2010.497314
Alwaer, H., & Clements-Croome, D. J. (2010). Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Building and Environment, 45(4), 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019
Antonowicz, D., Wróblewski, M., Suchomska, J., & Budzanowska, A. (2025). Mapping efforts in Polish higher education to tackle climate change. In J. Kekäle & R. Pinheiro (Eds.), Higher education policy for tackling climate change (pp. 141–168). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78479-8_6
Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2015). Aligning corporate real estate with the corporate strategies of higher education institutions. Facilities, 33(13–14), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-04-2014-0035
Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59, 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9265-2
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw. (2022). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2022–2025 [Strategy of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw 2022–2025]. https://uksw.edu.pl/uniwersytet/o-nas/misja-statut-strategia
Casimir Pulaski Radom University. (2022). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Technologiczno-Humanistycznego im. Kazimierza Pułaskiego w Radomiu na lata 2022–2029 [Strategy of the Casimir Pulaski University in Radom for 2022–2029]. https://bip.uniwersytetradom.pl/artykul/173/1787/strategia-rozwoju-na-lata-2022-2029
Cracow University of Technology. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki na lata 2021–2025 [Strategy of the Tadeusz Kościuszko Cracow University of Technology for 2021–2025]. https://bip.pk.edu.pl/index.php?ver=0&dok=3731
de Wilde, P. (2018). Building performance analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119341901.ch4
den Heijer, A. (2011). Managing the university campus: Information to support real estate decisions. Eburon Academic Publishers.
den Heijer, A. (2021). Campus of the future: Managing a matter of solid, liquid and gas. TU Delft.
Eurostat. (2022). Number of tertiary education students. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Tertiary_education_statistics
Falqueto, J. M., Hoffmann, V. E., Gomes, R. C., & Onoyama Mori, S. S. (2020). Strategic planning in higher education institutions: What are the stakeholders’ roles in the process? Higher Education, 79, 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00455-8
Galiano-Garrigos, A., & Andújar-Montoya, M. D. (2018). Building information modelling in operations of maintenance at the University of Alicante. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N1-1-11
Gdansk University of Technology. (2020). Strategia Politechniki Gdańskiej 2020–2030 [Strategy of the Gdansk University of Technology 2020–2030]. https://pg.edu.pl/files/2021-03/Strategia_PG_2020-2030.pdf
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
Hassanain, M., Sanni-Anibire, M., & Mahmoud, A. (2024). An assessment of users’ satisfaction with a smart building on university campus through post-occupancy evaluation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-12-2021-0714
Heimar Andersen, K., Johra, H., Rohde, L., Marszal-Pomianowska, A., Kvols Heiselberg, P., & O’Brien, W. (2024). Increased understanding of building operational performance through occupant-centric key performance indicators. Energy and Buildings, 323, Article 114756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114756
Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa. (2018). Strategia Uniwersytetu Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczego im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie [Strategy of the Jan Długosz University in Czestochowa]. http://www.bip.ajd.czest.pl/?idm=5&idm2=32
Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach [Strategy of the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce]. https://bip.ujk.edu.pl/uchwala_nr_1_20211.html
Jensen, M. (2009). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. In D. Chew & S. Gillan (Eds.), U.S. Corporate Governance (pp. 3–25). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/chew14856-001
Jędrzej Sniadecki Academy of Physical Education and Sport in Gdansk. (2020). Strategia rozwoju Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego i Sportu im. Jędrzeja Śniadeckiego w Gdańsku w latach 2020–2026 [Strategy of the Jedrzej Sniadecki Academy of Physical Education and Sport in Gdansk for 2020–2026]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAE9sdpWHrqb8wYWNNovbn0wAjEtwt3t/view
Joroff, M., Louargand, M., Lambert, S., & Becker, F. (1993). Strategic management of the fifth resource: Corporate Real estate. Industrial Development Research Foundation.
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw. (2020). Strategia rozwoju Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego Józefa Piłsudskiego w Warszawie do roku 2030 [Strategy of the Jozef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw until 2030]. https://awf.edu.pl/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/49167/27.z1.pdf
Kaklauskas, A., Daniūnas, A., Amaratunga, D., Urbonas, V., Gudauskas, R., Lill, I., D’amato, M., Trinkūnas, V., & Jackutė, I. (2012). Life cycle process model of a market-oriented and student-centred higher education. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16, 414–430. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.750631
Kettunen, J. (2015). Stakeholder relationships in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 21(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.997277
Kielce University of Technology. (2023). Strategia rozwoju Politechniki Świętokrzyskiej na lata 2023–2027 [Strategy of the Kielce University of Technology for 2023–2027]. https://tu.kielce.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Uch_S_188_23_zalacznik.pdf
Kirwan, B., & Rogers, J. (2020). The post-occupancy digital twin: A quantitative report on data standardization and dynamic building performance evaluation. International Journal of Digital Innovation in the Built Environment (IJDIBE), 9(2), 17–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDIBE.2020070102
Krakow University of Economics. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie 2021–2024 [Srategy of the Krakow University of Economics 2021–2024]. https://sg-cdn.uek.krakow.pl/file/root/akty-prawne/strategia-uek.pdf
Krumm, P. (1999). Corporate real estate management in multinational corporations: A comparative analysis of Dutch corporations. ARKO Publishers.
Lai, J. H., & Man, C. S. (2017). Developing a performance evaluation scheme for engineering facilities in commercial buildings: State-of-the-art review. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 21, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1247304
Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., & Dixit, M. K. (2014a). KPIs for facility’s performance assessment, Part I: Identification and categorization of core indicators. Facilities, 32(5–6), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09-2012-0066
Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., & Dixit, M. K. (2014b). KPIs for facility’s performance assessment, Part II: Identification of variables and deriving expressions for core indicators. Facilities, 32(5–6), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09-2012-0067
Lee, Y. (2019). Workplace health and its impact on human capital: Seven key performance indicators of workplace health. In O. Korhan (Ed.), Indoor environment and health (pp. 43–72). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85936
Li, H., Wang, Z., & Hong, T. (2021). Occupant-centric key performance indicators to inform building design and operations. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 14(6), 814–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2021.1876771
Licata, J., & Frankwick, G. (1996). University marketing: A professional service organization perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v07n02_01
Lublin University of Technology. (2021). Strategii rozwoju Politechniki Lubelskiej na lata 2021–2028 [Strategy of the Lublin University of Technology for 2021–2028]. https://pollub.bip.gov.pl/fobjects/download/1117040/6401_uchwala-nr-38-2021-viii-pdf.html
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University. (2019). Strategia Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie w latach 2019–2025 [Strategy of Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin for 2019–2025]. https://phavi.umcs.pl/at/attachments/2019/0402/091028-strategia-27-marca-2019-ostateczna-po-senacie.pdf
Massen, P. (2000). The changing roles of stakeholders in Dutch university governance. European Journal of Education, 35, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-3435.00039
McCann, L., Hutchison, N., & Adair, A. (2022). Calibration of stakeholder influence in the UK higher education sector. Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), 1502–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1916908
McKnight, P., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann-Whitney U test. In I. Weiner & W. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 2(2–4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Mustafa, F. A. (2017). Performance assessment of buildings via post-occupancy evaluation: A case study of the building of the architecture and software engineering departments in Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.06.004
Nawawi, A. H., & Khalil, N. (2008). Post-occupancy evaluation correlated with building occupants’ satisfaction: An approach to performance evaluation of government and public buildings. Journal of Building Appraisal, 4(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2008.22
Ninnemann, K., Liedtke, B., den Heijer, A., Gothe, K., Reisch, L., C., N. S., & Wallenborg, C. (2020). Hybrid environments for universities: A shared commitment to campus innovation and sustainability. Waxmann.
Nourse, H., & Roulac, S. (1993). Linking real estate decisions to corporate strategy. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 8(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1993.12090723
Poznan University of Life Sciences. (2022). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu 2022–2027 [Strategy of the Poznan University of Life Sciences 2022–2027]. https://puls.edu.pl/sites/default/files/strategia_2022-2027
Poznan University of Technology. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Politechniki Poznańskiej 2021–2030 [Strategy of the Poznan University of Technology 2021–2030]. https://senat.put.poznan.pl/sites/default/files/Uchwa%C5%82a%20Nr%2047%20-%202020-2024%20za%C5%82%C4%85cznik%20STRATEGIA%20PP.pdf
Preiser, W. (1995). Post-occupancy evaluation: How to make buildings work better. Journal of Facilities, 13(11), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779510097787
RAD-on. (2023). Studenci. https://radon.nauka.gov.pl/dane/instytucje-systemu-szkolnictwa-wyzszego-i-nauki
Re Cecconi, F., Moretti, N., & Claudio Dejaco, M. (2019). Measuring the performance of assets: A review of the facility condition index. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.7955
Rothschild, M., & White, L. J. (1995). The analytics of the pricing of higher education and other services in which the customers are inputs. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1086/261995
Rowley, J. (1997). Beyond service quality dimensions in higher education and towards a service contract. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889710156530
Rymarzak, M. (2025). Zarządzanie kampusami akademickich uczelni publicznych. Koncepcje, doświadczenia, kierunki zmian [Campus management of public academic universities. Concepts, experiences, directions of change]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdanskiego.
Rymarzak, M., & Marmot, A. (2020). Higher education estate data accountability: The contrasting experience of UK and Poland. Higher Education Policy, 33, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0109-5
Rymarzak, M., den Heijer, A., Curvelo Magdaniel, F., & Arkesteijn, M. (2020). Identifying the influence of university governance on campus management: Lessons from the Netherlands and Poland. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1298–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1616167
Rytkönen, E., & Heywood, C. (2015). Tackling the challenges of university campus management processes. In R. Crawford & A. Stephan (Eds.), Living and learning: Research for a better built environment: 49th International conference of the architectural science association (pp. 716–725). The Architectural Science Association.
Sangwa, N., & Sangwan, K. (2018). Development of an integrated performance measurement framework for lean organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 41–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0098
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students. Pearson.
Silesian University of Technology. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Politechniki Śląskiej na lata 2021–2026 [Strategy of the Silesian University of Technology for 2021–2026]. https://www.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/sites/880/2021/03/Strategia-Rozwoju-Politechnika-Slaska.pdf
Sleiman, S., Ouf, M., Luo, W., Kramer, R., Zeiler, W., Borkowski, E., Hong, T., Nagy, Z., & Chen, Z. (2024). Overview of occupant-centric KPIs for building performance and their value to various building stakeholders. Energy and Buildings, 322, Article 114704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114704
Smith, L., & Cavusgil, T. (1984). Marketing planning for colleges and universities. Long Range Planning, 17(6), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(84)90223-1
Szarek, M. (2023). Analysis of the importance and changes of stakeholders using the example of a university-based special purpose entity. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 176, 631–643. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.176.36
Travia, R. M., Larcus, J. G., Andes, S., & Gomes, P. G. (2020). Framing well-being in a college campus setting. Journal of American College Health, 70(3), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1763369
Umar, H., Mohammed, M., & Kanu, R. (2025). A post-occupancy performance evaluation study on user satisfaction with university student housing facilities. Facilities, 43(1/2), 54–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-04-2024-0064
University of Agriculture in Krakow. (2021). Strategia Uniwersytetu Rolniczego im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie na lata 2021–2025 [Strategy of the H. Kollataj University of Agriculture in Krakow for 2021–2025]. https://urk.edu.pl/d/BDHEFQT49XRA6Nz4rVA0GG0o8VBAvPRlRbgNEcWlYDg4ZNFcJczJWUWJKPjwpVkRHBCVWFj4LH1tuAwQ0MB9OTQQ8AEEyMhpJbB8uPB9ATVBKYBcUJQwGUD5NLy8oGwUKKCcabCYyWgNsUiM9A1IYFRspRwEjARUXdhs2NCoUFk1bcQZYOCdnAy8PMhAGRV1BASBUEC8RUg84SwUjaVgPChM6FGw4MxpJf1theUEPSQ/strategia_urk_2021_2025.pdf
University of Economics in Katowice. (2018). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 2018–2025 [Strategy of the University of Economics in Katowice 2018–2025]. https://www.ue.katowice.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/uczelnia/strategia/Strategia_Uniwersytetu_Ekonomicznego_w_Katowicach_PL.pdf
University of Life Sciences in Lublin. (2019). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Lublinie na lata 2019–2030 [Strategy of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin for 2019–2030]. https://up.lublin.pl/bip/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2021/02/strategia_rozwoju_uniwersytetu_przyrodniczego_w_lublinie_na_lata_2019-2030.pdf
University of Physical Education in Krakow. (2021). Strategia rozwoju AWF w Krakowie na lata 2021–2028 [Strategy of the University of Physical Education in Krakow for 2021–2028]. https://www.awf.krakow.pl/o-nas/strategia-rozwoju
University of Silesia in Katowice. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach na lata 2020–2025 [Strategy of the University of Silesia in Katowice for 2020–2025]. https://bip.us.edu.pl/sites/default/files/strategia_us-2021-07-19.pdf
University of Szczecin. (2019). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2019–2028 [Strategy of the University of Szczecin 2019–2028]. https://usz.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/za%C5%82%C4%85cznik-do-uchwa%C5%82y-nr-106.2019-1.pdf
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie na lata 2021–2030 [Strategy of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn for 2021–2030]. https://uwm.edu.pl/sites/default/files/dokumenty/Strategia_rozwoju_UWM_2021_2030.pdf
University of Warsaw. (2023). Strategia Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego [Strategy of the University of Warsaw]. https://monitor.uw.edu.pl/Lists/Uchway/Attachments/6626/M.2023.245.U.299.pdf
Wanke, A. (2017). Sustainable campus management at Freie Universität Berlin – Governance and participation matter. In W. Leal Filho, M. Mifsud, C. Shiel, & R. Pretorius (Eds.), Handbook of theory and practice of sustainable development in higher education (pp. 27–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47895-1_2
Warsaw University of Life Sciences. (2021). Strategia Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie do 2030 roku [Strategy of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences until 2030]. https://www.sggw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Startegia-SGGW-do-2030-roku.pdf?x89485
Warsaw University of Technology. (2021). Strategia rozwoju Politechniki Warszawskiej do roku 2030 [Strategy of the Warsaw University of Technology until 2030]. https://www.bip.pw.edu.pl/Wewnetrzne-akty-prawne/Dokumenty-ogolne/Strategia-Rozwoju-Politechniki-Warszawskiej-do-roku-2030
Weaver, T. (1976). What is the good of higher education? Higher Education Review, 8(3), 3–14.
Wilkins, S., Hazzam, J., & Ireland, J. J. (2022). Servicescape in transnational higher education: The effects of campus design, physical environment and facilities on student experience and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(2), 992–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2139792
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences. (2024). Strategia rozwoju Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu do 2030 roku [Strategy of the Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences until 2030]. https://bip.upwr.edu.pl/download/mGBUXLgBQLmg8VFZiSlcBUQZLUWRuHwgBBjcFbg8TWHdBBlhnRkk9WD9VFyw3ClVBDlBFamBPHQMOID5YAlVAb1oHSnNGFW1aOlQRNEpZEydRARA6JR0ZCwYrJ1gKElhhQUcbOQFXO2g8VFZiSlITTxYBFjo6BA4HS39DVxQYFDlBG1g7BU0nFW8SEjEEBkI_GwIBJyYIDhYaGU4HOlgKIT8YHi4XWj1eJUQdNwY_HloEQksUY1VYPkZwPR5EW1grClsfaV4bPEMnUQA9DwpQPEYdCT8jBxg9DSo-A1ZEShIRWBE-O0MuWzRTDjYBCG4HWy0GKyQaDA4QGg9DOU9PYFEHS3M7SipZNEQBBx0TRhEaAhcubkFPDggrBhNcVQohQUo/strategia_rozwoju_do_2030_roku_zalacznik_do_uchwaly_nr_85-2018_senatu_upwr.pdf
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences. (2021). Strategia Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu 2021–2030 [Strategy of the Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences 2021–2030]. https://awf.wroc.pl/o-uczelni/misja-wizja-wartosci-strategia/
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology. (2023). Strategia Politechniki Wrocławskiej 2023–2030 [Strategy of the Wrocław University of Science and Technology 2023–2030]. https://pwr.edu.pl/fcp/LGBUKOQtTKlQhbx08SlkTUhZeUTgtCgg9ACFDC0RGS3xSFVZpCFghUHcKVigEQUw/1/public/2023/docs/strategia__pwr_2023_22-06-23.pdf
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.