From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC

    Pernilla Gluch Affiliation
    ; Mathias Gustafsson Affiliation
    ; Henrikke Baumann Affiliation
    ; Göran Lindahl Affiliation


Real estate- and property owners’ rationales behind the adoption of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) respectively how LCC is actually used in renovation projects, is investigated through empirical data from a questionnaire survey sent to managers in Swedish real estate organisations. The study shows a positive attitude towards LCC. It is perceived to as a flexible and multi-functional tool with a familiar monetary format. Nevertheless, the study also reveals simplistic and undevel-oped views of how to use LCC. While much research has focused on developing sophisticated LCC tools, the findings indicate that practitioners’ interest in these refinements seems limited. The importance of understanding that LCC is used in a context of multiple and partly competing institutional logics of renovation is emphasised. The paper contributes to a more informed research in development of LCC tools as well as better informed LCC use among real estate and property owners.

Keyword : Life cycle costing (LCC), project management, property management, renovation, real estate, questionnaire, Sweden

How to Cite
Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., Baumann, H., & Lindahl, G. (2018). From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(3), 179-190.
Published in Issue
May 16, 2018
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Arditi, D., & Messiha, H. M. (1999). Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) in municipal organizations. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5(1), 1-10.

Arja, M., Sauce, G., & Souyri, B. (2009). External uncertainty factors and LCC: a case study, Building Research and Information, 37(3), 325-334.

Ástmarsson, B., Jensen, P. A., & Maslesa, E. (2013). Sustainable renovation of residential buildings and the landlord/tenant dilemma, Energy Policy, 63, 355-362.

Brown, N. W., Malmqvist, T., Bai, W., & Molinari, M. (2013). Sustainability assessment of renovation packages for increased energy efficiency for multi-family buildings in Sweden. Building and Environment, 61, 140-148.

Caccavelli, D., Krigsvol, G., Thamling, N., & Jaarto, P. (2005). LCC-REFURB guidebook: integrated planning for building refurbishment taking life-cycle costs into account. European Commission, Brussels.

Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about likert scales and likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106-116.

D’Incognito, M., Costantino, N., & Giovanni, C. M. (2015). Actors and barriers to the adoption of LCC and LCA techniques in the built environment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(2), 202-216.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Dhillon, B. (2013). Life cycle costing: techniques, models and applications. Routledge.

Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction – the role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451-464.

Farr, J. V. (2011). Systems life cycle costing: economic analysis, estimation, and management. CRC Press.

Flores-Colen, I., & De Brito, J. (2010). A systematic approach for maintenance budgeting of buildings façades based on predictive and preventive strategies. Construction and Building Materials, 24(9), 1718-1729.

Gluch, P. (Ed.) (2014). Perspektiv på LCC – en bok om långsiktiga beslut och styrning vid hållbar och energieffektiv renovering av byggnader. Report 2014:3, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Chalmers.

Gluch, P., & Baumann, H. (2004). The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Building and Environment, 39(5), 571-580.

Gluch, P., & Gustafsson, M. (2015, August). Acceptance and use of LCC as a decision support tool for renovation investments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management (ICCREM 2015) (pp. 821-828). Luleå, Sweden.

Goh, B. H., & Sun, Y. (2016). The development of life-cycle costing for buildings. Building Research and Information, 44(3), 319-333.

Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research and Information, 39(3), 239-255.

Higham, A., Fortune, C., & James, H. (2015). Life cycle costing: evaluating its use in UK practice. Structural Survey, 33(1), 73-87.

Hill, S., Lorenz, D., Dent, P., & Lützkendorf, T. (2013). Professionalism and ethics in a changing economy. Building Research and Information, 41(1), 8-27.

Junghans, L. (2013). Sequential equi-marginal optimization method for ranking strategies for thermal building renovation. Energy and Buildings, 65, 10-18.

Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Raslanas, S. (2005). Multi-variant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishments. Energy and Buildings, 37(4), 361-372.

Kirkham, R. J. (2005). Re‐engineering the whole life cycle costing process. Construction Management and Economics, 23(1), 9-14.

Korpi, E., & Ala-Risku, T. (2008). Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(3), 240-261.

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191-204.

Lindholm, A., & Suomala, P. (2007). Learning by costing: sharpening cost image through life cycle costing?. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(8), 651-672.

Love, P., & Bullen, P. A. (2009). Toward the sustainable adaptation of existing facilities. Facilities, 27(9/10), 357-367.

Ludvig, K. (2013). Making sense of and managing energy targets in public construction-client organisations (Licentiate degree thesis). Chalmers Univerity of Technology.

Ludvig, K., Stenberg, A.-C., & Gluch, P. (2013). The value of communicative skills for developing an energy strategy. Building Research and Information, 41(6), 611-621.

Mjörnell, K., Boss, A., Lindahl, M., & Molnar, S. (2014). A tool to evaluate different renovation alternatives with regard to sustainability. Sustainability, 6, 4227-4225.

Morrissey, J., Meyrick, B., Sivaraman, D., Horne, R., & Berry, M. (2012). Cost-benefit assessment of energy efficiency investments: accounting for future resources, savings and risks in the Australian residential sector. Energy Policy, 54, 148-159.

Oduyemi, O. I. (2015). Life cycle costing methodology for sustainable commercial office buildings (PhD degree thesis). University of Derby, UK.

Olsson, S., Malmqvist, T., & Glaumann, M. (2015). Managing sustainability aspects in renovation processes: interview study and outline of process model. Sustainability, 7(6), 6336-6352.

Olsson, S., Malmqvist, T., & Glaumann, M. (2016). An approach towards sustainable renovation: a tool for decision support in early project stages. Building and Environment, 106, 20-32.

Olubodun, F., Kangwa, J., Oladapo, A., & Thompson, J. (2010). An appraisal of the level of application of life cycle costing within the construction industry in the UK. Structural Survey, 28(4), 254-265.

Opoku, A., & Ahmed, V. (2014). Embracing sustainability practices in UK construction organizations. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(1), 90-107.

Palm, J., & Reindl, K. (2016). Understanding energy efficiency in Swedish residential building renovation: a practice theory approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 247-255.

Park, S. H. (2009). Whole life performance assessment: critical success factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1146-1161.

Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629-652.

Rex, E., & Baumann, H. (2008). Implications of an interpretive understanding of LCA practice. Busines Strategy and Environment, 17, 420-430.

Risholt, B., Time, B., & Hestnes, A. G. (2013). Sustainability assessment of nearly zero energy renovation of dwellings based on energy, economy and home quality indicators. Energy and Buildings, 60, 217-224.

Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2010). Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48-57.

Schaltegger, S., Müller, K., & Hindrichsen, H. (1996). Corporate environmental accounting. Chichester: Wiley.

Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., & Shree, V. (2011). Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 871-875.

Swarr, T. E., Hunkeler, D., Klöpffer, W., Pesonen, H.-L., Ciroth, A., Brent, A. C., & Pagan, R. (2011). Environmental life-cyclecosting: a code of practice. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(5), 389-391.

Thuvander, L., Femenias, P., Mjörnell, K., & Meiling, P. (2012). Unveiling the process of sustainable renovation. Sustainability, 4(6), 1188-1213." target="_blank

Wang, N., Chang, Y.-C., & Nunn, C. (2010). Lifecycle assessment for sustainable design options of a commercial building in Shanghai. Building and Environment, 45(6), 1415-1421.

Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., & Rivard, H. (2005). Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment, 40(11), 1512-1525.

Woodward, D. G. (1997). Life cycle costing – theory, information acquisition and application. International Journal of Project Management, 15(6), 335-344.

Zhang, X., Platten, A., & Shen, L. (2011). Green property development practice in China: costs and barriers. Building and Environment, 46(11), 2153-2160.