Evaluation of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat OLI data for land use and land cover classification across diverse geospatial regions using supervised machine learning classifiers

    Anubhava Srivastava Info
    Raziqa Masood Info
    Konika Abid Info
    Shikha Chadha Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2026.22919

Abstract

Employing advanced remote sensing techniques, this paper undertakes a rigorous technical investigation into the comparative performance of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 9 datasets. Leveraging the analytical  power of four sophisticated machine learning algorithms – CART, Random Forest, Gradient Tree Boosting, and Support Vector Machine. The study scrutinizes land cover classification across diverse study areas  in Lucknow and Dehradun. Evaluating Sentinel-2’s multispectral sensor capabilities, particularly in the red-edge and near-infrared bands, the research dissects its prowess in vegetation-rich environments, exploiting the “red-edge effect” for precise vegetation assessment. Conversely, Landsat data, including Landsat 8  and Landsat 9, is assessed for its adaptability in areas characterized by diverse land cover types, including urban landscapes. Delving into algorithmic performance metrics, Random Forest and sentinel-2 emerge as  the preferred choice for most vegetated area like Dehradun about 90% accuracy across varied scenarios, Gradient Tree Boosting and Landsat data emerges as the preferred choice for most urbanized (populated)  areas like Lucknow about 92% accuracy across varied scenarios. This paper contributes novel insights into the comparative utility of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 9 datasets, bolstered by advanced machine learning methodologies, for refined land cover mapping and monitoring applications.

Keywords:

Random Forest, land cover classification, Sentinel, Landsat, accuracy

How to Cite

Srivastava, A., Masood, R., Abid, K., & Chadha, S. (2026). Evaluation of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat OLI data for land use and land cover classification across diverse geospatial regions using supervised machine learning classifiers. Geodesy and Cartography, 52(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2026.22919

Share

Published in Issue
July 2, 2026
Abstract Views
58

References

Brovelli, M. A., Sun, Y., & Yordanov, V. (2020). Monitoring forest change in the Amazon using multi-temporal remote sensing data and machine learning classification on Google Earth Engine. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(10), Article 5801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100580

Chen, H., Fleskens, L., Baartman, J., Wang, F., Moolenaar, S., & Ritsema, C. (2020). Impacts of land use change and climatic effects on streamflow in the Chinese Loess Plateau: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 703, Article 134989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134989

Degbelo, A., & Kuhn, W. (2018). Spatial and temporal resolution of geographic information: An observation-based theory. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 3, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0053-8

Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Yan, Y. (2020). Network topology change detection based on statistical process control. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th High Performance Computing and Cluster Technologies Conference & 2020 3rd International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 145–151). New York, NY, USA. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409501.3409532

Roy, D. P., Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., Helder, D., Irons, J. R., Johnson, D. M., Kennedy, R., Scambos, T. A., Schaaf, C. B., Schott, J. R., Sheng, Y., Vermote, E. F., Belward, A. S., Bindschadler, R., Cohen, W. B., Gao, F., … Zhu, Z. (2014). Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001

Roy, P. S., Roy, A., Joshi, P. K., Kale, M. P., Srivastava, V. K., Srivastava, S. K., Dwevidi, R. S., Joshi, C., Behera, M. D., Meiyappan, P., Sharma, Y., Jain, A. K., Singh, J. S., Palchowdhuri, Y., Ramachandran, R. M., Pinjarla, B., Chakravarthi, V., Babu, N., Gowsalya, M. S., … Kushwaha, D. (2015). Development of decadal (1985–1995–2005) land use and land cover database for India. Remote Sensing, 7(3), 2401–2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70302401

Serwa, A., & Elbialy, S. (2021). Enhancement of classification accuracy of multi-spectral satellites’ images using Laplacian pyramids. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 24(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2020.12.006

Srivastava, A., Bharadwaj, S., Dubey, R., Sharma, V. B., & Biswas, S. (2022). Mapping vegetation and measuring the performance of machine learning algorithm in LULC classification in the large area using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 datasets of Dehradun as a test case. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43(B3-2022), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-529-2022

Srivastava, A., & Biswas, S. (2023, February 2–4). Analyzing land cover changes over Landsat-7 data using Google Earth Engine. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS) (pp. 1228–1233). Coimbatore, India. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIS56108.2023.10073795

Srivastava, A., Umrao, S., Biswas, S., dubey, R., & Zafar, M. I. (2023). FCCC: Forest cover change calculator user interface for identifying fire incidents in Forest region using satellite data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(7), 948–959. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.01407103

Srivastava, A. (2024). Temporal analysis of multi-spectral instrument level and surface reflectance data sets for seasonal variation in land cover dynamics by using Google Earth Engine. Geodesy and Cartography, 50(4), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2024.20106

Srivastava, A., & Sharma, H. (2024). AI-driven environmental monitoring using Google Earth Engine. In B. Pradhan & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), IoT sensors, ML, AI and XAI: Empowering a smarter world (pp. 375–385). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68602-3_19

Srivastava, A. (2025). Quantifying forest degradation rates and their impact on environmental condition in Dehradun, India. Science of the Total Environment, 992, Article 179987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179987

Waylen, P., Southworth, J., Gibbes, C., & Tsai, H. (2014). Time series analysis of land cover change: Developing statistical tools to determine significance of land cover changes in persistence analyses. Remote Sensing, 6(5), 4473–4497. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6054473

Wu, Y., Li, W., Wang, Q., Liu, Q., Yang, D., Xing, M., Pei, Y., & Yan, S. (2016). Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2112-0

Teluguntla, P. G., Thenkabail, P. S., Oliphant, A., Xiong, J., Gumma, M. K., Congalton, R. G., Yadav, K., & Huete, A. (2020). A 30-m landsat-derived cropland extent product of Australia and China using random forest machine learning algorithm on Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.07.017

Zhao, C., Chen, W., Wang, Q., Wu, Y., & Yang, B. (2015). A comparative study of statistical index and certainty factor models in landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study for the Shangzhou District, Shaanxi Province, China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(11), 9079–9088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1891-7

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Srivastava, A., Masood, R., Abid, K., & Chadha, S. (2026). Evaluation of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat OLI data for land use and land cover classification across diverse geospatial regions using supervised machine learning classifiers. Geodesy and Cartography, 52(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2026.22919

Share