Effect of using different satellite ephemerides on GPS PPP and post processing techniques

    Khaled Mahmoud Abdel Aziz   Affiliation
    ; Loutfia Elsonbaty Affiliation


The orbital error is one of the errors in GPS which affect the accuracy of GPS positioning. In this research GPS broadcast, ultra-rapid, rapid and precise satellite ephemerides are used for processing different baseline lengths among some CORS stations by using the Trimble Business Center software (TBC) and different satellite ephemerides (NRCan ultra-rapid, NRCan rapid and IGS final) are tested in CSRS-PPP online application at the same CORS stations.

In this research, when using TBC software for processing the different baseline lengths by using the different satellite ephemerides and compared the coordinates of CORS stations which obtained from the different satellite ephemerides with each other. The results showed that the best satellite ephemerides closest to rapid and final satellite ephemerides are the ultra-rapid (00 UTC) and ultra-rapid (06 UTC). When processing the same CORS stations which used at TBC on CSRSPPP online application by using the different satellite ephemerides it is found also that the NRCan ultra-rapid closest to final satellite ephemerides.

Keyword : Trimble Business Center software (TBC), Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS), Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS), Precise Point Positioning (PPP), Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)

How to Cite
Abdel Aziz, K. M., & Elsonbaty, L. (2021). Effect of using different satellite ephemerides on GPS PPP and post processing techniques. Geodesy and Cartography, 47(3), 104-110.
Published in Issue
Oct 13, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Barchesky, F. (2011). Utilization of IGS information for improved real-time GPS positioning [Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering thesis]. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Emlid. (n.d.). NRCAN CSRS-PPP results assessment.

Geng, T., Zhang, P., Wang, W., & Xie, X. (2018). Comparison of ultra-rapid orbit prediction strategies for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. Sensors, 18(2), 477.

Government of Canada. (n.d.-a). Geodetic tools and data.

Government of Canada. (n.d.-b). Precise Point Positioning.

Huot, C., Tetreault, P., Mireault, Y., Kouba, J., & Popelar, J. (1997). Assessment of NRCan rapid and predicted GPS satellite orbits. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of The Institute of Navigation (pp. 261–266). Albuquerque, NM.

International GNSS Service. (n.d.). Products.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.-a). GNSS orbit products.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.-b).

Ocalan, T., Erdogan, B., & Tunalioglu, N. (2013). Analysis of web-based online services for GPS relative and Precise Point Positioning techniques. Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas.

Ocalan, T., Erdogan, B., Tunalioglu, N, & Durdag, U. M. (2016). Accuracy investigation of PPP method versus relative positioning using different satellite ephemerides products near/ under forest environment. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 20(4), D1–D9.

Ogutcu, S. (2020). Performance assessment of IGS combined/ JPL individual rapid and ultra-rapid products: Consideration of Precise Point Positioning technique. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 5(1), 1–14.

Shi, J. (2012). Precise Point Positioning integer ambiguity resolution with decoupled clocks [PhD thesis]. Department of Geomatics engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.

SOPAC. (n.d.-a).

SOPAC. (n.d.-b).