Basic construction of the flat angle calibration test bench for geodetic instruments

    Domantas Bručas Info
    Vytautas Giniotis Info
    Petras Petroškevičius Info

Abstract

In our days precise geodetic instruments are very widely used in geodesy, building structures, surveying, machine engineering etc. Many of those instruments are based on precise measurement of the directions differences (ie measurement of angles). Such instruments are: theodolites, digital theodolites, total stations etc. Testing and calibration of these instruments is quite complicated task, although it is evidently needed. In this paper we present the creation and preliminary research of accuracy of the test bench designed to perform the testing and calibration of such geodetic instruments.

Stendo geodezinių prietaisų plokščiajam kampui kalibruoti

Santrauka. Pastaruoju metu tikslūs geodeziniai prietaisai yra plačiai naudojami geodezijoje, statyboje, topografijoje, mašinų gamyboje it t. t. Daugumos šių prietaisų veikimo principas pagrįstas tiksliu kampų matavimu. Tokie prietaisai – teodolitai, elektroniniai tacheometrai ir kt. Atlikti šių prietaisų patikrą ir kalibruoti – gana sudėtingas techninis uždavinys. aprašomas naujai sukurtas įrenginys tokiems geodeziniams prietaisams kalibruoti ir tikrinti, jo kūrinio eiga bei pradiniai tikslumo tyrimai.

First published online: 03 Aug 2012

Keywords:

circular scale, measurement, evaluation, accuracy, uncertainty

How to Cite

Bručas, D., Giniotis, V., & Petroškevičius, P. (2012). Basic construction of the flat angle calibration test bench for geodetic instruments. Geodesy and Cartography, 32(3), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.3846/13921541.2006.9636698

Share

Published in Issue
August 3, 2012
Abstract Views
427

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2012-08-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bručas, D., Giniotis, V., & Petroškevičius, P. (2012). Basic construction of the flat angle calibration test bench for geodetic instruments. Geodesy and Cartography, 32(3), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.3846/13921541.2006.9636698

Share