The relationship between e-learning service and student satisfaction a case study at the Syrian Virtual University (SVU)
Purpose – This study aims at exploring the impact of electronic services provided by the Syrian Virtual University (SVU) on student satisfaction. Besides, this study seeks to determine the dimensions of both electronic services and customer satisfaction at the SVU, and to what extent these dimensions may vary in accordance with different personal characteristics among students.
Research methodology – A quantitative research method was adopted using an online questionnaire to collect data from students registering in different SVU programs.
Findings – Overall, results were analysed using the SPSS: 18. The results indicated that the relationship between all electronic services dimensions and student satisfaction at the SVU were positively significant except for the bulk SMS dimension. Electronic service dimensions are also all applied throughout the SVU (SMS- Web Request- Facebook- email- Electronic library- Website- Learning Management System) respectively. Besides, results show that neither electronic services dimensions nor satisfaction dimensions vary with regards to gender, speciality and age. Furthermore, satisfaction dimensions such as privacy and security – ease of use – order fulfilment – customer service – electronic service portfolio are all applied in the SVU.
Research limitations – The study in this paper is limited to only one university since the Syrian Virtual University is the only virtual university in Syria. Also, the study focused only on university’s students, and not it is administrative staff.
Practical Implications – the results of this paper are beneficial for the SVU future and other universities attempting to provide online services. Thus, results from advice the SVU to keep their services up-to-date with the latest technological improvements, especially the university’s website. This could be achieved by making it more users friendly and ultimately improve students’ satisfaction. Moreover, the SVU should highlight the bulk SMS service weaknesses and try to use it more efficiently. Furthermore, the SVU employees could use the results of this paper to segment their current and future services provided in the future correctly taking into account the differences between gender and other demographical factors.
Originality/Value – This study is one of the first studies to investigate the relationships between E-Learning services and student satisfaction in virtual environments, especially the Syrian Virtual Universities SVU. Moreover, this study investigates specific dimensions regarding both E-services and student satisfaction and brings up a reliable model for further research.
Keyword : e-Learning service, student satisfaction, Syrian Virtual University (SVU)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AlHamad, A. Q., Al Qawasmi, K. I., & AlHamad, A. Q. (2014). Key factors in determining students’ satisfaction in online learning based on Web Programming course within Zarqa University. International Journal of Global Business, 7(1), 7.
Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134.
Ali, D., John, D., David, D., & Anne, B. (2014). The antecedents of student loyalty in online programs. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2013-0007
Ann, B., Martin, R., & Clive, H. (2014). Student engagement and learning: Case study of a new module for business undergraduates at Cass business school. Journal of Management Development, 33(6), 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04-2014-0038
Askar, P., Altun, A., & Ilgaz, H. (2008). Learner satisfaction on blended learning. E-leader Krakow, 1-7.
Ba, S., & Johansson, W. C. (2005). An exploratory study of the impact of e-service process on online customer satisfaction. Forthcoming in Production and Operations Management, 21(4), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.3401/poms.1070.0006
Banerjee, G. (2011). Blended environments: Learning effectiveness and student satisfaction at a small college in transition. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.190
Booth, A. G., & Clark, B. P. (2009). A service‐oriented online learning environment. On the Horizon, 17(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120910993268
Brooks, S. (2011). Enhancing E - Learning at the Polytechnic of Namibia: An Interactive Qualifying Project report completed in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor of Science degree at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (Master Thesis) (pp. 1-79). Faculty Orcester Polytechnic Institute.
Cheawjindakarn, B., Suwannatthachote, P., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2013). Critical success factors for online distance learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Creative Education, 3(08), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38B014
Corrall, S., & Keates, J. (2011). The subject librarian and the online learning environment: A study of ukuniversities. Program, 45(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331111107385
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education Inc., Boston, MA.
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-325.
Dhman, Z. A. Z. (2011). The effect of customer relationship management (CRM) concept adoption on customer satisfaction – customer’s perspective the case of coastal municipalities’ water utility cmwu- rafah branch. A thesis submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration, 1-171.
Dalati, S., & Alchach, H. (2018). The effect of leader trust and knowledge sharing on staff satisfaction at work: investigation of universities in Syria. Business, Management and Education, 16, 190-205. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2018.2852
Dalati, S., Raudeliūnienė, J., & Davidavičienė, V. (2017). Sustainable leadership, organizational trust on job satisfaction: empirical evidence from higher education institutions in Syria. Business, Management and Education, 15(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2017.360
Dalati, S., & Al Hamwi, S. E. (2016). Sustainable development in higher education through service quality and price fairness: empirical evidence from private universities in Syria. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(3)
Emerald Insight. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Fernandes, C., Ross, K., & Meraj, M. (2013), Understanding student satisfaction and loyalty in the UAE HE sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(6), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2012-0082
Facebook. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/svuonline.org
Ganjinia, H., Gilaninia, S., & Tajani, T. K. (2013). Evaluation of online service quality on customer satisfaction in public banks of guilan. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics, And Management Studies, 1(9), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.12816/0003790
Giannousi, M., Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2009). Students’ satisfaction from blended learning instruction. In TCC-Teaching Colleges and Community Worldwide Online Conference, 2009(1), 61-68.
He, D., Mao, M., & Peng, Y. (2006, October). DiLight: A digital library based e-Learning environment for learning digital libraries. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2845-2852). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://doi.org/10.1145/1378889.1378973
Hermans, C. M., Haytko, D. L., & Stenerson, B. M. (2009). Student satisfaction in web-enhanced learning environments journal of instructional pedagogies. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 1(1), 1-19.
Ho, S. K. & Wearn, K. (1996). A higher education TQM excellence model: HETQMEX. Quality Assurance in Education, 4, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889610116049
Iacobucci, D., & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(4), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_14
Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.798
Karimi, L., & Ahmad, T. B. T. (2013), Perceived learning and satisfaction in a blended teacher education program: an experience of Malaysian teacher trainees. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 197-211.
Khattab, S. A., & Fraij, F. (2005). Assessing students’ satisfaction with quality of service of students’ information system, Management and Marketing Journal, 9(1), 110-125.
King, M. D. (2013). Motivation and education: performance, commitment, and satisfaction among pharmacy students.
Kistow, B. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: A study of a graduate school of business, Trinidad and Tobago. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 1(2).
Kotzer, S., & Elran, Y. (2012). Modular object-oriented dynamic learning environment moodle. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 14(1), 201-210.
Kumbhar, V. M. (2012). Conceptualization of e-services quality and e-satisfaction: A review of literature. Management Research and Practice, 4(4), 12-18.
Kuo, Y. C. (2010). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in distance. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement of doctorate of philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Le, Q. (2012). 18-e‐portfolio for enhancing graduate research supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198248
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQween, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: a data collector’s field guide. Family Health International, North Carolina. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994071.n280
Mail Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from https://mail.svuonline.org/login.php
Mehrabi, J., Javadi, M. H. M., & Samangoei, B. (2011). Studying effect of customer relationship management (CRM) system on attracting customer satisfaction case study: Teacher insurance company in isfahan province. International Journal of Learning & Development, 2(1), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i1.1355
Mellema, S., L. Smart, E., & M. Shull, E. (2009). Blended learning and user satisfaction. Issues in Information Systems, X(1), 126-130.
Min, S., & Khoon, C. C. (2014). Demographic factors in the evaluation of service quality in higher education: A Structural Equation Model (SEM) Approach. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n1p90
Monaliz, A., Hans, R. K., & Ana, G. (2014). An extensive study of the e-learning practices within Cyprus universities. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(3), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2012-0587
Moore, J., Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Moodle Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from http://moodle.svuonline.org
Naaj, M., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.28945/1692
Naidu, S. (2006). E - Learning: A Guide book of Principles, Procedures and Practices (6th ed., pp. 1-100). Indea: Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia (CEMCA).
Naik, C. N. K., Gantasala, S. B., & Prabhakar, G. V. (2010). Service quality (servqual) and its effect on customer satisfaction in retailing. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 231-243.
Nfila, R. (2005). Academic libraries support for e-learning and opportunities: the case of university of Botswana Library. Journal of International Education in Business, 6(6), 120-131.
Niwaz, A., & Khan, M. S. (2013). Evaluation of job placement and satisfaction of graduate students of virtual university Pakistan. International Journal of Learning & Development, 3(6), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v3i6.4771
O’Driscoll, F. (2012). What matters most: An exploratory multivariate study of satisfaction among first year hotel/hospitality management students. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(3), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211240303
Paulsen, M. (2002). Online education systems: discussion and definition of terms. NKI Distance Education, 2(2), 1-8.
Peng, P. J., & Samah, A. (2006). Measuring students’ satisfaction for quality education in a e-learning university. Unitar E-Journal, 2(1), 11-21.
Premadasa, S., & Meegama, R. G. N. (2013). Mobile learning environment with short messaging service: Application to a campus environment in a developing country. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311306291
Prasad, R. K., & Jha, M. K. (2013). Quality measures in higher education: A review and conceptual model. Quest Journals, Journal of Research in Business and Management, 1(3), 23-40.
Ramayah, T., & Lee, J. W. C. (2012). System characteristics, satisfaction and e-learning usage: a structural equation model (SEM). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(2), 196-206.
Rashid, T., & Raj, R. (2006). Customer satisfaction: relationship marketing in higher education e-learning. Innovative Marketing, 2(3), 24-35.
Requestsystem Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from https://requestsystem.svuonline.org
Roca, J., Chiu, C., & Martinez, F. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
Roy, M. H., & Elfner, E. (2002). Analyzing student satisfaction with instructional technology techniques. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(7), 272-277.
Sabir, R. I., Akhtar, N., Bahadur, W., & Sajjad, M. S. (2014). Impact of distance education on student performance: a case of Allama Iqbal open university. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(3).
Saha, P., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Relationship between online service quality and customer satisfaction a study in internet banking, 2005:083 Shu Master’s Thesis relationship between online service quality and customer satisfaction: a study in internet banking Parmita Saha Yanni Zhao Luleå University of Technology (Master Thesis) (pp. 1-107).
Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. Online submission.
Sánchez, R. A., Hueros, A. D., & Ordaz, M. G. (2013). E‐learning and the university of Huelva: a study of webct and the technological acceptance model. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311306318
Sarantakos, S. (2004). Social research (2nd ed.). Palgrave, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20901-5
Sawang, S., Newton, C., & Jamieson, K. (2013). Increasing learners’ satisfaction/intention to adopt more e‐learning. Education and Training, 55(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911311295031
So, S. (2009). The development of a SMS-based teaching and learning system. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0201.08
Springer Link. (2019). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com
Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from http://lms.svuonline.org/mlepremium/
Socialnetwork Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from http://socialnetwork.svuonline.org/svu_socialnetwork/ A
SVU. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.svuonline.org/isis/bulk_SMS.php
Svuonline. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.svuonline.org/isis/index.php
Tarigan, J. (2011). Factors influencing users satisfaction on e-learning systems. Journal Management dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.13.2.177-188
Twitter. (2019). Retrieved from https://twitter.com/SVU_Syria
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
Weerasinghe, I. S., Lalitha, R., & Fernando, S. (2017). Students satisfaction in higher education literature review. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533-539.
Wang, M. Y., & Hwang, M. J. (2004). The e-learning library: only a warehouse of learning resources? The Electronic Library, 22(5), 408-415.
Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030