Does green human resources management pay off? The mediating role of green innovation and employee attitude in sustainable supply chain management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25544Abstract
This research demonstrates that the relationship between Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) practices and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) performance is mediated by organizational capabilities rather than a direct process, and this effect is supported by the Resource-Based View (RBV).
Research methodology – For the study, data were collected from a total of 476 participants from 71 companies operating in the textile sector and engaging in green management processes in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The significant role the region plays in machine-made carpet production was a key factor in this selection.
Findings – It has been observed that GHRM enhances a company’s product and process in- novation capacity; it also reveals a critical distinction between the impacts of different innovation types. Process innovation plays a strong role in enhancing environmental performance through internal improvements. Additionally, it has been observed that concern is a stronger motivator than knowledge in achieving sustainability goals.
Research limitations – The cross-sectional design of the study limits definitive proof of causal relationships between variables, it is recommended that future studies utilize longitudinal de- signs that can monitor the long-term effects of GHRM.
Practical implications – The social aspect of sustainability in SSCM can be achieved by visible product innovations. Additionally, the perception gap between senior management and operational employees has been identified as the primary obstacle to implementing sustainability strategies. It has been emphasized that addressing this gap requires mobilizing emotional concern, a driving force stronger than purely cognitive knowledge.
Originality/Value – This study brings together a detailed model by examining the effect of GHRM on SSCM relationship mediated by different innovation and attitude types simultaneously. This gives a more nuanced and applicable information.
Keywords:
green human resources management, sustainable supply chain management, environmental attitudes, green innovationHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
Chan, R. Y., & Lau, L. B. (2000). Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760010335358
Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.007
Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, 32(6), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.001
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Papadopoulos, T. (2017). Green supply chain management: Theoretical framework and further research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(1), 184–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2016-0011
Dunlap, R., & Jones, R. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482–524). Greenwood.
Graves, L. M., & Sarkis, J. (2018). The role of employees’ leadership perceptions, values, and motivation in employees’ provenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.013
Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016). Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – the mediating role of green HRM practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1065431
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Liu, J.-Y., Zhang, Y.-J., & Cho, C. H. (2023). Corporate environmental information disclosure and green innovation: The moderating effect of CEO visibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3020–3042. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2535
Munawar, S., Yousaf, H. Q., Ahmed, M., & Rehman, S. (2022). Effects of green human resource management on green innovation through green human capital, environmental knowledge, and managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.06.009
Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., & Blome, C. (2017). Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0
Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2016). Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x
Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.607
Singh, R., Joshi, A., Dissanayake, H., Iddagoda, A., Khan, S., Félix, M. J., & Santos, G. (2025). Integrating Industry 4.0, Circular Economy, and Green HRM: A Framework for sustainable transformation. Sustainability, 17(7), Article 3082. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073082
Song, W., Yu, H., & Xu, H. (2021). Effects of green human resource management and managerial environmental concern on green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0315
Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700607
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2008). The role of organizational size in the adoption of green supply chain management practices in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(6), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.173
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.