Towards poverty alleviation for the base of pyramid: social business model in urban low-cost housings

    Mohammed Ali Berawi   Affiliation
    ; Perdana Miraj   Affiliation


Purpose – this study investigates alternative a small-scale social business model that potentially generate sustainable income for households at the base of the pyramid. A comparison of two low-cost housings that have a different geographical condition and local characteristics is examined.

Research methodology – this research adopted two-stage approach to address the research objective. A pairwise comparison was employed to evaluate alternatives based on selected criteria for decision-making. In the second stage, the proposed business model was assessed by taking into account investment, processing cost, and revenue.

Findings – the findings of this research suggest suitable business model that combine profit orientation and facilitates social mission in urban settings. The business model offers attractive financial feasibility from the investor viewpoint and simultaneously engages low-income households to improve their prosperity level leaving the base of the pyramid (BOP) status.

Research limitations – this paper is not involving division of responsibility between stakeholders in low-cost housing and BOP sector. This study also not discussed how social entrepreneurs play a role in the social business model. There is a need to further investigate how the impact of social entrepreneurs on this model and engage collaboration with interest parties to engage community development.

Practical implications – the findings recommend strategies that can be used by policy-makers and other related stakeholders to scale-up the business model, empower more low-income households, and create new job opportunities for urban poor. The findings of this research also indicate social business model that enables households at the BOP to earn sustainable income and release their current poverty status.

Originality/Value – the research is one of the few studies that explored alternatives to social business models available for urban poor by taking into account project feasibility. No previous research has been attempted to consider both pairwise comparison and life cycle cost approach in the development of social business models. This research can be found useful for those with similar issues not only in emerging economies but also in developed countries.

Keyword : developing countries, feasibility, housing, poverty, social business model, sustainability

How to Cite
Berawi, M. A., & Miraj, P. (2023). Towards poverty alleviation for the base of pyramid: social business model in urban low-cost housings. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 21(1), 169–189.
Published in Issue
Jul 17, 2023
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Akter, S., Jamal, N., Ashraf, M. M., McCarthy, G., & Varsha, P. (2020). The rise of the social business in emerging economies: A new paradigm of development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 282–299.

Barro, R. J. (2013). Inflation and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14(1), 121–144.

Biglaiser, G., & McGauvran, R. J. (2022). The effects of IMF loan conditions on poverty in the developing world. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(3), 806–833.

Bocken, N. M. P., Fil, A., & Prabhu, J. (2016). Scaling up social businesses in developing markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 295–308.

Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019). Internal oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: How can social enterprises help themselves before helping others? Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 607–619.

CNN. (2020). Survei: Kewirausahaan Sosial Bisa Bangun Ekonomi Kreatif.

Corburn, J., & Sverdlik, A. (2017). Slum upgrading and health equity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(4), 342.

Dahles, H., Khieng, S., Verver, M., & Manders, I. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and tourism in Cambodia: Advancing community engagement. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(6), 816–833.

Dembek, K., Sivasubramaniam, N., & Chmielewski, D. A. (2020). A systematic review of the bottom/base of the pyramid literature: Cumulative evidence and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 365–382.

Durairaj, S. K., Ong, S. K., Nee, A. Y. C., & Tan, R. B. H. (2002). Evaluation of life cycle cost analysis methodologies. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(1), 30–39. (2023). WACC For Multiple Companies in Indonesia.

Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1).

Franc-Dabrowska, J., Madra-Sawicka, M., & Milewska, A. (2021). Energy sector risk and cost of capital assessment – Companies and investors perspective. Energies, 14(6), 1613.

Geradts, T., Jansen, J., & Cornelissen, J. (2022). Let’s profitably fight poverty, shall we? How managers use emotional framing to develop base of the pyramid ventures inside a large fast-moving consumer goods company. Organization & Environment, 4, 579–606.

Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., & Rydberg, T. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(1), 90–96.

Headey, D., Goudet, S., Lambrecht, I., Maffioli, E. M., Oo, T. Z., & Russell, T. (2022). Poverty and food insecurity during COVID-19: Phone-survey evidence from rural and urban Myanmar in 2020. Global Food Security, 33, 100626.

Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003). The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 49–59.

Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. (2018). Marines and fisheries in number (in Indonesian).

Jaiyebo, O. (2003). Women and household sustenance: Changing livelihoods and survival strategies in the peri-urban areas of Ibadan. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 111–120.

Jakarta Central Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Poverty level in DKI Jakarta.

Jakarta Provincial Government. (2018). Housing service retribution rates (in Indonesian).

Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377.

Koziol, C. (2014). A simple correction of the WACC discount rate for default risk and bankruptcy costs. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42(4), 653–666.

Kuckertz, A., Bernhard, A., Berger, E. S. C., Dvouletý, O., Harms, R., Jack, S., & Kibler, E. (2023). Scaling the right answers – Creating and maintaining hope through social entrepreneurship in light of humanitarian crises. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00356.

Laylo, A. (2018). Macro-level enabling conditions for the formation of social business enterprises in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 5–13.

Li, Z., Chow, D., Ding, D., Ying, J., Hu, Y., Chen, H., & Zhao, W. (2020). The development and realisation of a multi-faceted system for green building planning: A case in Ningbo using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Energy and Buildings, 226, 110371.

Madanaguli, A., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Clauss, T., Kraus, S., & Kaur, P. (2023). Diving into the uncertainties of open innovation: A systematic review of risks to uncover pertinent typologies and unexplored horizons. Technovation, 119, 102582.

Majid, W. (2022). Housing allowance and the perverse theory of housing outcomes. Urban Research & Practice.

Ma, L., Wang, S., & Wästfelt, A. (2022). The poverty of farmers in a main grain-producing area in Northeast China. Land, 11(5), 594.

Mian, M. A., & Vélez-Pareja, I. (2008). Applicability of the Classic WACC Concept in Practice. Latin American Business Review, 8(2), 19–40.

Michelini, L., & Fiorentino, D. (2012). New business models for creating shared value. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(4), 561–577.

Ministry of Public Works and Housing. (2016). Penataan Kawasan Kumuh Oleh Pemerintah.

Miraj, P., Berawi, M. A., & Utami, S. R. (2021). Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost–benefit evaluation. Building Research and Information, 49(6), 624–638.

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation – Canvas. Wiley.

Ouma, S., Corburn, J., & Weru, J. (2022). Property rights, public health, and planning for informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(3), 302–316.

Palomares-Aguirre, I., Barnett, M., Layrisse, F., & Husted, B. W. (2018). Built to scale? How sustainable business models can better serve the base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4506–4513.

Pinzon Amorocho, J. A., & Hartmann, T. (2022). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for residential building renovation using pairwise comparison and TOPSIS methods. Journal of Building Engineering, 53, 104596.

Rasmussen, B. (2007). Business models and the theory of the firm. In Pharmaceutical Industry Project (Issue Jun).

Sabatier, V., Medah, I., Augsdorfer, P., & Maduekwe, A. (2017). Social business model design and implementation in developing countries: Learning from an affordable medicine developed in Burkina Faso. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 48–57.

Sarkar, A. (2019). The role of new ‘smart technology’ to provide water to the urban poor: A case study of water ATMs in Delhi, India. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 4(4), 166–174.

Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.

Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.

Semprebon, E., Porsse, M. de C. S., Gurak, E. C., & Dameto, F. (2020). Explaining poverty and business with network concepts analysis. Business and Society Review, 125(3), 311–327.

Spieth, P., Schneider, S., Clauß, T., & Eichenberg, D. (2019). Value drivers of social businesses: A business model perspective. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 427–444.

Srimulyani, V. A., & Hermanto, Y. B. (2022). Impact of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial motivation on micro and small business success for food and beverage sector in East Java, Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 10.

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

Thakur, V., Parida, D. J., & Raj, V. (2022). Sustainable municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in the smart cities in Indian context. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and development: Emerging futures. In UN Habitat World Cities Report 2016.

United Nations Development Programme. (2018). The 2018 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): Illuminating Inequalities. Human Development Report.

Visser, W., & Prahalad, C. K. (2013). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. In The Top 50 Sustainability Books.

Wikimedia Commons. (2007). Indonesia provinces blank map.

World Bank. (2022). Fact sheet: An adjustment to global poverty lines.

Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325.

Zardari, N. H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S. M., & Yusop, Z. Bin. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer.

Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.