Teacher training and education programs in Latvia: are e-competences included?

    Kristine Uzule   Affiliation


Purpose – the purpose of this research is to review the contents of Latvian teacher training and education programs in order to identify if the development of students’ e-competences is included into these programs as an important objective and value. The importance of the development of these competences has been stressed in various EU documents and scientific literature. The scientific importance of the paper lies in gathering evidence for the inclusion of e-competences into teacher training and education curricula and demonstrating that e-competences have not yet acquired a value status in teacher training and education programs.

Research methodology – the methodology included the keyword in context and concordance analysis of self-assessment reports and program descriptions, which were run in the software AntConc.

Findings – out of 190,000 word tokens, the KWIC analysis identified only 75 entries related to e-competences, most of which included basic skills of information and communication technologies. Other more advanced concepts, such as virtual reality, artificial intelligence, adaptive spaces, e-competences, e-education and e-learning, were hardly mentioned.

Research limitations – one limitation of this research is the focus on Latvian teacher training and education programs without their comparison to similar European programs, which would allow for determining the competitiveness of such Latvian programs in Europe.

Practical implications – the obtained results suggest that the development of e-competences has not been perceived as value in teacher training and education programs in Latvia, and in order to bridge this gap, programming and artificial intelligence courses should be introduced into the curricula of such programs.

Originality/Value – the research has demonstrated that the EU aim of boosting the competitiveness of the European education through the development of e-competences is yet to be implemented into teacher training and education programs in Latvia.

Keyword : e-competences, e-education, e-learning, education programs

How to Cite
Uzule, K. (2020). Teacher training and education programs in Latvia: are e-competences included?. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 18(2), 294-306.
Published in Issue
Aug 25, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Abdykhalykova, A. (2019). Modern technologies in foreign language teaching: The case of L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Economics and Culture, 16(2), 39–45.

Al-Frahait, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.

Awouters, V., & Jans, S. (2009). E-learning competencies for teachers in secondary and higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(1), 58–50.

Babic, S. (2012). Factors that influence academic teacher’s acceptance of e-learning technology in blended learning environment. In E. Pontes, A. Silva, A. Guelfi, & S. T. Kofuji (Eds.), E-learning – organizational infrastructure and tools for specific areas (pp. 3–18). InTech.

Bjekic, D., Krneta, R., & Milosevic, D. (2010). Teacher education from e-learner to e-teacher: Master curriculum. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 202–212.

Carril, P. C. M., Samamed, M. G., & Selles, N. H. (2013). Pedagogical roles and competencies of university teachers practicing in the e-learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 462–487.

Coulon, A., Battezzati, L., Gray, D., Ryan, M., & Mansouri, I. (2004). E-Learning for teachers and trainers. Innovative practices, skills and competences. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.

Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendations on key competences for lifelong learning.

Duh, M., Bratina, R., & Krasna, M. (2012). The role of digital competences in electronic education. Media, Culture and Public Relations, 3(2), 131–137.

Eryilmaz, M., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2018). Individual flipped learning and cooperative flipped learning: Their effects on students’ performance, social, and computer anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432–442.

European Commission. (2014). European e-competence framework 3.0. A common European framework for ICT professionals in all industry sectors.

Fonstad, N. O., & Lanvin, B. (2009). European e-competence curricula development guidelines. Synthesis Report “ICT Curricula in Higher Education Europe”. INSEAD.

Fukuyama, F. (2000). Wielki wstrząs: Natural ludzka a odbudowa porządku społecznego. Wydawnictwo Bertelsmann Świat Książki.

Ghilay, Y. (2018). Comprehensive Technology-Based Learning (CTBL): A comparison between varous types of quantitative courses. Economics and Culture, 15(2), 14–24.

Hammad, R. (2018). A hybrid e-learning framework: Process-based, semantically-enriched and serviceoriented [PhD Thesis]. Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Hattinger, M., & Eriksson, K. (2020). Mind the gap: A collaborative competence e-learning model between university and industry. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 79–88).

Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2011). A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6–18.

Lau, F., & Bates, J. (2004). A review of e-learning practices for undergraduate medical education. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(1), 71–87.

Lwoga, E. T. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning in management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 10(1), 4–21.

Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 403–415.

Moranska, D. (2016). E-competences as a condition of the development of information society. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(2), 51–59.

Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D., Martinez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J. L., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2530–2540.

Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–18.

Schweizer, H. (2004). E-learning in business. Journal of Management Education, 28(6), 674–692.

Shearer, R. L., Aldemir, T., Hitchcock, J., Resig, J., Driver, J., & Kohler, M. (2020). What students want: A vision of a future online learning experience grounded in distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 36–52.

Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M. E., Nolting, K., Roser, M., & Voigt, D. (2004). Is e-learning the solution for individual learning? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 2(2), 273–280.

Wang, R., Ryu, H., & Katuk, N. (2015). Assessment of students’ cognitive-affective states in learning within a computer-based environment: Effects on performance. Journal of ICT, 14, 153–176.